Well I'm not sure that we can Slip. We all invest some meaning into the words we percive others using. As we know the English language is a complex thing with many words having multiple meanings dependant on contex.
We are all at differant levels of language comprehension, some of us even have specific learning dificulties to contend with, and for some English is not the first language. The trick I think then is to use plain language as offten as you can, hah yet how to debate complex matters using plain language? On 4 Feb, 07:19, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > In response to my "There does seem to be some degree of over > extrapolation concerning comments", Ash writes: > > The art of a well formed sentence is a sign of a well formed thought. > It seems the less definition lent to terminology, modality, etc. the > more inviting an assertion becomes for confusion. How do we reduce > without submitting to esoteric jargon, thus reducing access to ideas? > That, also, while avoiding what I've heard teachers call, 'diarrhea of > the mouth'? << Ash > > So how do we present an idea in a way that can be concise and yet > reach across the globe to relate to the many different minds? Does > condensing simply allow others to expand on it or misconstrue the > intention? > > We do have opposite extremes of the spectrum here with gabby and > justin. Constipation is no better than diarrhea so what is the cure? > (stop thinking what you are thinking) ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
