On 8 Feb, 13:30, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> And, thank
>
> > God, there aren't door-to-door atheists...although that would make a
> > classic comedy sketch!!
>
> They'd be called something like 'People for Truth' and the God denial
> pamphlets would be heavily laced with Communist dogma.  I could
> actually see something like that going on in China or N. Korea.  Maybe
> Vietnam as well.  If religious paraphernalia is found in your home you
> are quietly reported to the authorities as a possible problem.  Maybe
> get sent to a 're-education camp.'  Somebody should do a movie.
> Something appropriately dark and sinister along the lines of "A Brave
> New World."
>
> dj

As it was an intended comedy sketch, I think 'Non-Christian
Scientists' would be a better name.  Or 'Normons', as opposed to
Mormons. Of course, there's a strong argument for 'Dawkins' Witnesses'
as well. ;-)

>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 7 Feb, 19:03, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The measure constantly changes in regards to mocking. What you need to
> >> realise is that many people do not see a difference between gods and
> >> fairies.
>
> > They would be ignorant, then.
>
> >>And many people have weighed the positive and negative
> >> aspects of religion and found the negative to be far greater than the
> >> positive. I personally have never said that there are no positive
> >> aspects, simply that the negative are active and powerful aspects
> >> while the positive are passive and easily dismissed by the negative.
>
> > Easily dismissed by some.  I wonder why?
>
> >> If you make an assertion -like god is real- you must expect there to
> >> be opposition. Every concept has detractors.
>
> >> I find your complaint about atheists stating their belief at every
> >> opportunity to be hilarious. You are guilty of an identical action.
> >> Often, your complaint and the complaint of religion not being treated
> >> nicely are interchangeable, especially among evangelical believers. It
> >> generally comes down to them having the right to talk, promote,
> >> discuss, and even go door to door harassing people, but complain
> >> loudly whenever anyone points out that there is no evidence of their
> >> belief or that specific points of belief had been disproved centuries
> >> past.
>
> > Would you like to name a few specifics, here?  That is, of things that
> > have been disproven.  I'm just curious as to which things.  And, thank
> > God, there aren't door-to-door atheists...although that would make a
> > classic comedy sketch!!
>
> >> On Feb 7, 10:05 am, 1CellOfMany <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > Fiddler, I fear that you have misunderstood what I was saying.  There
> >> > are many people who do not believe in God, and are willing to discuss
> >> > what they do believe about the way the world works. They are also
> >> > willing to share their reasons for nor believing in God.  But there
> >> > are others who not only do not believe in God, but they DO believe
> >> > that anyone who DOES believe in God is a fool, and they state this
> >> > belief repeatedly.  They also tend to belittle belief in God by
> >> > comparing it to belief in fairies or some other silly thing.  They
> >> > also seem to believe that the effect of religion on the world has been
> >> > mostly negative, and while they can supply examples of negative
> >> > effects, they seem to be blind t the many positive effects that
> >> > religion has had.
>
> >> > Now, I really don't care whether they believe these things or not, but
> >> > some of these particular atheists make it a point to state their
> >> > beliefs at every opportunity.  It is as though they were on a crusade
> >> > to stamp out religion.  Now, this is a forum for discussion of ideas
> >> > and beliefs.  I share my thoughts and beliefs, and I try to be
> >> > respectful of the thoughts and beliefs of others.  When my beliefs are
> >> > mocked and ridiculed in a forum like this, it is a sign that the other
> >> > person is not willing to listen and to discuss things rationally.
> >> > This is irritating to many of us, but it also reflects poorly on the
> >> > character of the person who is doing the mocking.  I am merely asking
> >> > that you show as much respect for my ideas, whether you agree with
> >> > them or not, as you would like me to show for your ideas.
>
> >> > On Feb 7, 12:38 am, fiddler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > And you are demonstrating that one word may have two intended uses. A
> >> > > belief in god is not the same as a belief in the sun rising. Yes,
> >> > > everyone believes something. Some of us believe in testable reality
> >> > > and some of us in untestable -and often proven wrong- religions.
> >> > > Though the word is the same, the use is not. Your rant had no true
> >> > > point, it was only that... a rant.
>
> >> > > On Feb 6, 9:29 pm, 1CellOfMany <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > So, OZ, if I understand what you are saying, you *believe* that, "The
> >> > > > common failure of "believers" is their inability to understand a
> >> > > > simple concept: ----   Lack of belief, is not, itself, belief --- "
>
> >> > > > (If you don't believe that statement, then why would you make it!)
>
> >> > > > I find that the common failure of those who snipe at "believers" in
> >> > > > the cause of atheism is their tendency to stereo-type and talk trash
> >> > > > about believers.  So, by your own words, you have demonstrated the
> >> > > > point of my rant.
>
> >> > > > On Feb 6, 12:11 pm, MajorOz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > The common failure of "believers" is their inability to understand 
> >> > > > > a
> >> > > > > simple concept:
>
> >> > > > > ----   Lack of belief, is not, itself, belief ---
>
> >> > > > > cheers
>
> >> > > > > oz, learner, not believer- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to