Heh of course all the time remembering that a measurement of a day is dependant on which star your planet orbits, the shape and size of the planet, it's distance for it's star and it's orbit around this star.
Although, it is a good point that you make Pat. On 8 Feb, 16:09, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 Feb, 14:40, Errol <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Feb 8, 3:14 pm, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Would you like to name a few specifics, here? That is, of things that > > > have been disproven. I'm just curious as to which things. And, thank > > > God, there aren't door-to-door atheists...although that would make a > > > classic comedy sketch!! > > > How about; the universe and everything in it was created in 6 days? > > Not impossible at all given modern science. The age of the universe > all depends on the rate of the expansion of space-time. And we KNOW > that the rate of expansion (governed by the value of the Hubble > Constant) has varied in the past. In fact, it's a functional part OF > the Standard Model, i.e., that period of VAST expansion just after the > Big Bang called 'Inflation'. So, we KNOW, beyond doubt, that the rate > of expansion has varied and that the Hubble Constant is not a > constant, rather, it's a variable. What we DON'T know is how fast the > rate slowed down from the period of inflation to the first time the > 'constant' was measured. There's every possibility that the universe > COULD have been on 'fast forward' up to the point of mankind. Since > all radioactive decay is RELATIVE TO the value of the Hubble Constant, > we cannot rely on radioactive decay as any indication of the actual > age of the universe; rather, it's only an indication of the RELATIVE > age. And there absolutely NO WAY of discovering the rate of slowing > OF the Hubble Constant as all of the indicators are relative TO it. > It could well be that it slowed in 6 stages that, given the value of > the Hubble Constant today, amounts to 6 days of current time. > > Nice try, but I've already given that one some thought and modern > science CANNOT rule out a 6-day Creation based on what we know to > date. Next? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
