We don't use only 5 senses; there are clearly more. Apprehension about our environment can be passed on without what we normally think of as cognition. Intuition, in common uses of the word is as often wrong as right, perhaps more so. There are organs in biology that sense light, yet are not eyes. Hard to do a job on Bernstein without writing a longer paper; first impressions concern false definitions.
On 20 Feb, 16:15, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > Abstract: Intuition is defined for the purposes of this analysis as: > the appearance in the mind of > accurate information about the external world, which can be shown to > have come not through the > five senses, nor through a rearrangement of stored memory contents. > Forms of intuition obeying this > definition have been explored scientifically under such labels as > telepathy, precognition, > presentiment, and remote viewing. This paper summarizes those > scientific findings, and presents a > few theories which have been hypothesized to explain them. Those > theories are largely based in > theoretical physics, including quantum non-locality, holography, and > complex space-time. Related > biological theories are also cited, which propose to explain how > information might move from the > subatomic level up into waking consciousness, for example through DNA > structures or neuronal > microtubules. - PAUL BERNSTEIN, Ph.D. > > http://www.paulbernstein.info/intuition.pdf > > What is your experience with intuition? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
