The difference between intuition and intellect is speed. I don't accept the 
definition of intuition as somehow being able to channel uninterpreted 
information. This is a seductive and absolutely unproven hypothesis parallel to 
Jung's concept of connecting with the collective unconscious. 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: fiddler <[email protected]>
To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, Feb 20, 2010 7:18 pm
Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Intuition


The primary definition and example of intuition is exactly what you
listed here. Such ideas as people intuiting a lie or the path through
a maze are commonly found in this category. Molly is referring to the
pseudo-sciences of parapsychology. People such as Bernstein try not to
use the prior and discredited definitions due to the obvious lack of
any evidence that they represent anything real and are constantly and
wrongly applying improper terms in it's stead.

On Feb 20, 2:54 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Pretty much what you ruled out of your definition.  Perception using
> our actual physical senses.  It's been proven that people give off
> different odors(pheromones or hormones or perspiration or whatever)
> while experiencing certain emotions.  I think there are certain people
> more sensitive to these forms of stimulus then others.  Sharks can
> smell a drop of blood in the ocean a mile away.  Perhaps some humans
> have a similar feel for their environment they can't explain any other
> way but to claim paranormal abilities.
>
> Observation skills and a thorough knowledge of psychology give clues
> that some people are able to put together and 'guess' what people will
> do or have done.  It's as simple and as difficult as that.
>
> dj
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I will ask you both, Neil and Don, what, do you think, is intuition?
>
> > On Feb 20, 4:42 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I'm pretty sure Molly is speaking of paranormal senses.  Above and
> >> beyond what your average neurologist would consider a biological
> >> 'sense.'  I think there are some pretty amazing sensitive and
> >> perceptive people out there but I don't believe in what Molly's
> >> supplied definition of intuition is.
>
> >> dj
>
> >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > We don't use only 5 senses; there are clearly more.  Apprehension
> >> > about our environment can be passed on without what we normally think
> >> > of as cognition.  Intuition, in common uses of the word is as often
> >> > wrong as right, perhaps more so.  There are organs in biology that
> >> > sense light, yet are not eyes.  Hard to do a job on Bernstein without
> >> > writing a longer paper; first impressions concern false definitions.
>
> >> > On 20 Feb, 16:15, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> Abstract: Intuition is defined for the purposes of this analysis as:
> >> >> the appearance in the mind of
> >> >> accurate information about the external world, which can be shown to
> >> >> have come not through the
> >> >> five senses, nor through a rearrangement of stored memory contents.
> >> >> Forms of intuition obeying this
> >> >> definition have been explored scientifically under such labels as
> >> >> telepathy, precognition,
> >> >> presentiment, and remote viewing. This paper summarizes those
> >> >> scientific findings, and presents a
> >> >> few theories which have been hypothesized to explain them. Those
> >> >> theories are largely based in
> >> >> theoretical physics, including quantum non-locality, holography, and
> >> >> complex space-time. Related
> >> >> biological theories are also cited, which propose to explain how
> >> >> information might move from the
> >> >> subatomic level up into waking consciousness, for example through DNA
> >> >> structures or neuronal
> >> >> microtubules. - PAUL BERNSTEIN, Ph.D.
>
> >> >>http://www.paulbernstein.info/intuition.pdf
>
> >> >> What is your experience with intuition?
>
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >> > Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> > [email protected].
> >> > For more options, visit this group 
> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to