You are as usual Manfraco Frank the Elder, a real piece of work (not a derogatory comment or an ad hom attack), while in fact you are with your post, exhibiting emotions that may not be acceptable to others.
When you say "we" are you speaking on behalf of others in here or are you referring to yourself and yours? I think others should have their own say in the matter and not be spoken for by you. If it is just you then you should say "I" and not "we". I don't see anyone else being "upset" by what you call my emotions and in fact I'm not a very emotional person just a very opinionated one. By self admission I admit being a cold heart prick. On Mar 13, 3:32 pm, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Slip Disc! > If your are going to upset the rest of us with your emotions, why > should we accept them anyhow? > You may have your emotional dilemmas as you like, but do not impose > them on us. > This is only my personal views; but if you want to know more then you > have to try to find it within yourself, if nobody else of the group > comes up with a better explanation. > > On Mar 13, 10:31 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > but only if they are acceptable to the > > > > rest of us. <<Manfraco > > > Really, I have a hard time understanding this. I take it that if my > > emotions are not acceptable to you and yours then it is deemed > > unacceptable? > > > By what right does anyone or any society have to determine that > > someone's emotions are not acceptable. > > > Of course I will reiterate my first reply. > > > Morality has a broad scope considering much of it is defined by > > society/culture/religion. Emotional attachment to a moral dilemma > > would have to be based on the defined moral incident specific to a > > circumstance. > > > I think we'd be better to work with a specific moral dilemma if we are > > going to establish the correctness of moral emotions and whether they > > should be kept in check or allowed to flow freely. > > > Anyone have an example of a moral dilemma? > > > Lee you started this so you should provide an example of what you were > > thinking about. > > > On Mar 12, 4:57 pm, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Lee! > > > I believe that in a moral dilemma emotions must be kept in check by > > > reason, which is the base of acceptable human standard, therefore > > > emotions have a role in it; but only if they are acceptable to the > > > rest of us. > > > > On Mar 10, 1:46 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > So a though occoured to me yesterday. > > > > > Is it better to approach moraly dilemars in an emotionly unattached > > > > reasonable way, or do emotions have a role to play in moral questions?- > > > > Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
