Mouse in his pocket maybe? an absolutely apoplectic mouse? On Mar 13, 5:21 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > You are as usual Manfraco Frank the Elder, a real piece of work (not a > derogatory comment or an ad hom attack), while in fact you are with > your post, exhibiting emotions that may not be acceptable to others. > > When you say "we" are you speaking on behalf of others in here or are > you referring to yourself and yours? I think others should have their > own say in the matter and not be spoken for by you. If it is just you > then you should say "I" and not "we". > > I don't see anyone else being "upset" by what you call my emotions and > in fact I'm not a very emotional person just a very opinionated one. > By self admission I admit being a cold heart prick. > > On Mar 13, 3:32 pm, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Slip Disc! > > If your are going to upset the rest of us with your emotions, why > > should we accept them anyhow? > > You may have your emotional dilemmas as you like, but do not impose > > them on us. > > This is only my personal views; but if you want to know more then you > > have to try to find it within yourself, if nobody else of the group > > comes up with a better explanation. > > > On Mar 13, 10:31 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > but only if they are acceptable to the > > > > > rest of us. <<Manfraco > > > > Really, I have a hard time understanding this. I take it that if my > > > emotions are not acceptable to you and yours then it is deemed > > > unacceptable? > > > > By what right does anyone or any society have to determine that > > > someone's emotions are not acceptable. > > > > Of course I will reiterate my first reply. > > > > Morality has a broad scope considering much of it is defined by > > > society/culture/religion. Emotional attachment to a moral dilemma > > > would have to be based on the defined moral incident specific to a > > > circumstance. > > > > I think we'd be better to work with a specific moral dilemma if we are > > > going to establish the correctness of moral emotions and whether they > > > should be kept in check or allowed to flow freely. > > > > Anyone have an example of a moral dilemma? > > > > Lee you started this so you should provide an example of what you were > > > thinking about. > > > > On Mar 12, 4:57 pm, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Lee! > > > > I believe that in a moral dilemma emotions must be kept in check by > > > > reason, which is the base of acceptable human standard, therefore > > > > emotions have a role in it; but only if they are acceptable to the > > > > rest of us. > > > > > On Mar 10, 1:46 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > So a though occoured to me yesterday. > > > > > > Is it better to approach moraly dilemars in an emotionly unattached > > > > > reasonable way, or do emotions have a role to play in moral > > > > > questions?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
