Manfranco don't speak for me as you do not have the wisdom or knowledge to do that.. speak only for yourself..!!! Allan
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Slip Disc! > If your are going to upset the rest of us with your emotions, why > should we accept them anyhow? > You may have your emotional dilemmas as you like, but do not impose > them on us. > This is only my personal views; but if you want to know more then you > have to try to find it within yourself, if nobody else of the group > comes up with a better explanation. > > On Mar 13, 10:31 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > but only if they are acceptable to the > > > > > rest of us. <<Manfraco > > > > Really, I have a hard time understanding this. I take it that if my > > emotions are not acceptable to you and yours then it is deemed > > unacceptable? > > > > By what right does anyone or any society have to determine that > > someone's emotions are not acceptable. > > > > Of course I will reiterate my first reply. > > > > Morality has a broad scope considering much of it is defined by > > society/culture/religion. Emotional attachment to a moral dilemma > > would have to be based on the defined moral incident specific to a > > circumstance. > > > > I think we'd be better to work with a specific moral dilemma if we are > > going to establish the correctness of moral emotions and whether they > > should be kept in check or allowed to flow freely. > > > > Anyone have an example of a moral dilemma? > > > > Lee you started this so you should provide an example of what you were > > thinking about. > > > > On Mar 12, 4:57 pm, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Lee! > > > I believe that in a moral dilemma emotions must be kept in check by > > > reason, which is the base of acceptable human standard, therefore > > > emotions have a role in it; but only if they are acceptable to the > > > rest of us. > > > > > On Mar 10, 1:46 am, Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > So a though occoured to me yesterday. > > > > > > Is it better to approach moraly dilemars in an emotionly unattached > > > > reasonable way, or do emotions have a role to play in moral > questions?- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > -- ( ) I_D Allan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
