Fiddler:

"Morals are far too fluid...to be a guide in any dilemma;
reason...provides the ability to make decisions."

Assuming you actually meant this, you implied that:

1. Morals are not a constant.
2. Morals are not based on reason.

How could anyone live with a system of morality like that - one
divorced from rationality and is "fluid", e.g., changes from day to
day - on what basis? Irrationality? I suppose so.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to