Most philosophy is not keen on socially approved epistemic authority Dark, yet we have to consider peer review and probably some form of ideal speech situation. The trouble is much that is social is not evaluated much.
On 19 Mar, 15:02, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > ahaan.. i know wat i know and wen i know something different i adjust wat i > know to fit wat i know now...... > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:05 AM, monkebus <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know what I know until I know something different. > > > That's what I believe, but I know I can't prove it. Oops, did I say > > know. > > > On Mar 6, 12:06 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE EVEN THOUGH YOU CANNOT PROVE IT?" > > > > Great minds can sometimes guess the truth before they have either the > > > evidence or arguments for it (Diderot called it having the "esprit de > > > divination"). What do you believe is true even though you cannot prove > > > it? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > .com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
