That is a really good investigative query there; I mean "why isn't there more evaluation of the social?"
Peer review is usually biased to some degree or at least there is a preoccupation with On Mar 20, 7:06 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > Most philosophy is not keen on socially approved epistemic authority > Dark, yet we have to consider peer review and probably some form of > ideal speech situation. The trouble is much that is social is not > evaluated much. > > On 19 Mar, 15:02, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ahaan.. i know wat i know and wen i know something different i adjust wat i > > know to fit wat i know now...... > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:05 AM, monkebus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I know what I know until I know something different. > > > > That's what I believe, but I know I can't prove it. Oops, did I say > > > know. > > > > On Mar 6, 12:06 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "WHAT DO YOU BELIEVE IS TRUE EVEN THOUGH YOU CANNOT PROVE IT?" > > > > > Great minds can sometimes guess the truth before they have either the > > > > evidence or arguments for it (Diderot called it having the "esprit de > > > > divination"). What do you believe is true even though you cannot prove > > > > it? > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > > .com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
