Cheer up, Allan! I would say 85% of the time markers got lost on the way to the surface there.
On Mar 23, 8:40 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > I see the discussions that follow.. and I like some of the features of > gravity like what Chris said.. they are very neat.. now > > My problem with Gravity is following conversations I find it extremely > difficult.. in other words trying to put it simple I am lost 85% of the > time. On Me I can quickly look up a back topic and I am presented with what > I have "*not*" read and I can quickly scan them. > I think gravity is very rich in people and there are some fascinating people > there well i am getting older and change is not as easy.. > Allan > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ulysses here, wondering what any of you think about the new > > Gravity.com arena. > > > Here are some of my thoughts. A plus is the ability to explore other > > conversations while partaking in a few of your own. In comparison > > with ME there are thousands more participants so one can move out of a > > room into another without have to log into a new place and change > > parties. However, I found that most replies don't get answers right > > away and some don't get any. One can easily get too spread out in > > there and forget where they were. I'd rather just be able to Tag the > > conversations I took part in. It seems I could spend 20 minutes just > > retracing my steps. > > > The Orbiting feature I find cumbersome, in that after logging on there > > are too many little tidbits of what everyone had to say and do, just > > too much needless information. I don't feel I need to be informed > > that someone simply liked a reply. In fact I had to stop orbiting a > > couple of people because they post so much that I had to scroll down > > near 30 bits to get to the next. So that part of getting back to > > conversations is time consuming. A big minus for me there is that > > even knowing that someone replied to a reply does not necessarily mean > > that you will find it at the end of the conversation because they can > > reply midway any time. That means that I have to scan the entire > > conversation to find the reply, which could take some time if the > > conversation is lengthy. > > > The whole badge thing is like stroking people along with little perks, > > I guess to keep the ego soothed but I found them kinda silly. I think > > there is a generation that is finding it a great place. > > > I did enjoy being able to attach a face to the name feature and I'm > > wondering how many are using out dated photos. hehe Mine is a few > > years old but I really haven't changed any since then, except for > > looking a bit younger now. lol > > > I came across this piece which explains what the execs had in mind > > when they started up this project. > > >http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/16/exclusive-ex-myspace-execs-launch-gr... > > > Well overall I think it isn't a bad place and it is an alternative > > when this place is dead and it is a chance to meet new people. > > > I'll give it a 6.5 What are your thoughts? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > -- > ( > ) > I_D Allan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
