Ahem... the badges are cool!!! plus can sumone tell me how to start a new
post at gravity.. i just cant figure out..and is gravity fiendly enuf for
someone whos visually impaired .. i have a friend i want to invite...

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, this is an annoyance.  I'm also not a fan of the badges but I can see
> how this encourages some people to learn more how to navigate the site.
> Rewards based systems work.  I just wish the reward was a little, well, less
> virtual.  Say, instead of a badge you get 10 pts. and when you get 500 you
> can redeem for a gift certificate or a mug or a hat or some such material
> goodies.
>
> dj
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This is a good feature but I notice that I have to scroll around to
>> find a comment because, as you say they aren't at the bottom.  This
>> isn't bad if the overall thread is short but after several replies
>> that have turned into individual threads it gets harder to find an
>> individual comment.
>> From the home page I'm notified that chris replied to a comment but
>> when I go there I have to search for the comment that chris made
>> because it could be anywhere; in the beginning or at the end and
>> anywhere in between.  The more the comments the longer it takes to
>> find.
>>
>> On Mar 31, 11:13 am, Kierkecraig <[email protected]>
>>  wrote:
>> > What I like about Gravity is that you can reply to a comment made on a
>> > topic thread and it threads itself below.  In google groups if you
>> > reply to a comment it just puts it at the bottom with the rest of the
>> > comments.  I wish Gravity allowed for even more threading.  I don't
>> > know, maybe google groups does it too and I just haven't figured it
>> > out over all these years.
>> >
>> > On Mar 30, 6:07 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > No fears, Rigs. This list will never be shut down, unless Google
>> > > discontinues the service, which doesn't seem likely. ;) I can't post
>> to
>> > > Gravity easily on my phone, and reading the posts here while on a
>> smoke
>> > > break is one of my simple pleasures. :)
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:38 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > Thank you for the invitation and I'll see about it later as I am
>> > > > swamped plus my computer needs a fresh start so I may wait. I have
>> > > > enjoyed the topics and comments here and hope this forum doesn't
>> close
>> > > > down. I will probably change my name as there is a rigsby and all
>> > > > sorts of interlopers-lol!// On the bright side, the weather has been
>> > > > great and life and family in fine shape and changes plus
>> strawberries
>> > > > are in and Easter desserts are my latest obsession. Last Friday I
>> made
>> > > > my first apple strudel from scratch and it was beginner's luck!
>> > > > Imagine that! Plus nothing relaxes like filing your taxes! :-)
>> Cheers
>> > > > to all...
>> >
>> > > > On Mar 26, 11:11 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > Yeah, I'm digging it, and we're finding new blood in there as
>> well. Glad
>> > > > to
>> > > > > know you're still alive! ;D
>> >
>> > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Kierkecraig <
>> > > > [email protected]
>> >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > Chris,
>> > > > > > I see, Gabby emailed me and I interpreted from what she said as
>> the
>> > > > > > group was moving.  I've joined the Gravity group now.  I can see
>> why
>> > > > > > you started a group there, it seems to be quite user friendly.
>> > > > > > Craig
>> >
>> > > > > > On Mar 26, 6:11 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > I don't know...what's this about it "moving"? :)
>> >
>> > > > > > > There's no moving. I think many of the traditionalists, myself
>> > > > included,
>> > > > > > > will always like the convenience of an email list. I just
>> formed a ME
>> > > > > > group
>> > > > > > > on Gravity so that we had a place for more three dimensional,
>> rich
>> > > > media
>> > > > > > > friendly conversations. It seems to be working out pretty
>> well.
>> >
>> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Kierkecraig <
>> > > > > > [email protected]
>> >
>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > So what's this about ME moving to "Gravity"?  What in the
>> world is
>> > > > > > > > "Gravity"?
>> > > > > > > > Kierkecraig
>> >
>> > > > > > > > On Mar 22, 11:17 am, Chris Jenkins <
>> [email protected]>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > What is the 6.5 measuring? Is that a 10 scale as a
>> website? As a
>> > > > > > > > > conversational tool?
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > Here are my thoughts:
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > 1. The conversations there are much more rich media
>> friendly. I
>> > > > can
>> > > > > > embed
>> > > > > > > > > images, links, videos, etc, right into the page, making it
>> more
>> > > > > > likely to
>> > > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > > seen.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > 2. The conversations are three dimensional - a "Reply" can
>> be
>> > > > fully
>> > > > > > > > fleshed
>> > > > > > > > > out as a separate thread using the comments below it,
>> while not
>> > > > > > > > interrupting
>> > > > > > > > > the stream of the original topic.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > 3. The influx of people being driven by Gravity's
>> marketing
>> > > > efforts
>> > > > > > means
>> > > > > > > > > that our conversations get to a wider audience.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > As I've previously stated, I don't think Gravity will ever
>> be a
>> > > > > > > > replacement
>> > > > > > > > > for the ME list, short of Google shutting down the
>> service. I
>> > > > think
>> > > > > > it's
>> > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > fantastic augmentation, however.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Slip Disc <
>> [email protected]>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > Ulysses here, wondering what any of you think about the
>> new
>> > > > > > > > > > Gravity.com arena.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > Here are some of my thoughts.  A plus is the ability to
>> explore
>> > > > > > other
>> > > > > > > > > > conversations while partaking in a few of your own.  In
>> > > > comparison
>> > > > > > > > > > with ME there are thousands more participants so one can
>> move
>> > > > out
>> > > > > > of a
>> > > > > > > > > > room into another without have to log into a new place
>> and
>> > > > change
>> > > > > > > > > > parties.  However, I found that most replies don't get
>> answers
>> > > > > > right
>> > > > > > > > > > away and some don't get any.  One can easily get too
>> spread out
>> > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > there and forget where they were. I'd rather just be
>> able to
>> > > > Tag
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > conversations I took part in.  It seems I could spend 20
>> > > > minutes
>> > > > > > just
>> > > > > > > > > > retracing my steps.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > The Orbiting feature I find cumbersome, in that after
>> logging
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > there
>> > > > > > > > > > are too many little tidbits of what everyone had to say
>> and do,
>> > > > > > just
>> > > > > > > > > > too much needless information.  I don't feel I need to
>> be
>> > > > informed
>> > > > > > > > > > that someone simply liked a reply.  In fact I had to
>> stop
>> > > > orbiting
>> > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > couple of people because they post so much that I had to
>> scroll
>> > > > > > down
>> > > > > > > > > > near 30 bits to get to the next.  So that part of
>> getting back
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > conversations is time consuming.  A big minus for me
>> there is
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > > > > > even knowing that someone replied to a reply does not
>> > > > necessarily
>> > > > > > mean
>> > > > > > > > > > that you will find it at the end of the conversation
>> because
>> > > > they
>> > > > > > can
>> > > > > > > > > > reply midway any time.  That means that I have to scan
>> the
>> > > > entire
>> > > > > > > > > > conversation to find the reply, which could take some
>> time if
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > conversation is lengthy.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > The whole badge thing is like stroking people along with
>> little
>> > > > > > perks,
>> > > > > > > > > > I guess to keep the ego soothed but I found them kinda
>> silly.
>> > > >  I
>> > > > > > think
>> > > > > > > > > > there is a generation that is finding it a great place.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > I did enjoy being able to attach a face to the name
>> feature and
>> > > > I'm
>> > > > > > > > > > wondering how many are using out dated photos. hehe
>>  Mine is a
>> > > > few
>> > > > > > > > > > years old but I really haven't changed any since then,
>> except
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > > > > > looking a bit younger now. lol
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > I came across this piece which explains what the execs
>> had in
>> > > > mind
>> > > > > > > > > > when they started up this project.
>> >
>> > > > > >
>> http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/16/exclusive-ex-myspace-execs-launch-gr.
>> > > > > > > > ..
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > Well overall I think it isn't a bad place and it is an
>> > > > alternative
>> > > > > > > > > > when this place is dead and it is a chance to meet new
>> people.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > I'll give it a 6.5  What are your thoughts?
>> >
>> > > > > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to
>> the
>> > > > Google
>> > > > > > > > Groups
>> > > > > > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> > > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
>> > > > [email protected].
>> > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > > > > > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>> <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
>> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
>> > > > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
>> > > > > > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
>> > > > > > > > > > .
>> > > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
>> > > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>> >
>> > > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> Google
>> > > > > > Groups
>> > > > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > > > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>> <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
>> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
>> > > > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
>> > > > > > > > .
>> > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
>> > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>> >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> Google
>> > > > Groups
>> > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> .
>> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>> <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
>> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
>> > > > > > .
>> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
>> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequoted text
>> -
>>  >
>> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>> >
>> > > > --
>> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>> <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
>> > > > .
>> > > > For more options, visit this group at
>> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to