Shape is only a convention in geometry, geometry itself conventional. No need for god or Glasgow.
On 1 Apr, 15:49, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > LMAO! That's a fine one gabby! > > On Apr 1, 9:27 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I saw the picture, too, but didn't find it difficult to see the > > objects as part of a 3D scenario. Join us over at Gravity, too, and > > see what I mean. No strings attached. *laughing* > > > On 1 Apr., 15:07, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 29 Mar, 16:44, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I would say most of mine was self inflicted! I also have found that > > > > hill. as for a spherical cube, it is more than possible, it is proven! > > > > > www.math.ias.edu/~arao/pubs/tiling.pdf > > > > I followed your directions of typing in the link and was able to see > > > the pdf file. The only picture it displays is a 2-D splay of circles > > > and rounded circular things inside a square. Hardly convincing, as > > > both a sphere and a cube are 3-D objects. > > > > However, if I take up the argument and agree that the authors have > > > 'proven' that such a sphereical cube can exist, it demanded the > > > existence of more than just 3 spatial dimensions, so, it would mean > > > that, if God CAN make a sphereical cube, He would have to do so in a > > > universe that has more dimensions than those recognised by the > > > Standard Model or Quantum Mechanics, and THAT, my friends, lends more > > > credence to String Theory as being the truth of our universe. So, If > > > I give in and agree with the authors, then it only backs up MY > > > proposition that String Theory is the truth. So...thanks for that, as > > > it, if anything, lends credence to my own theories. ;-) > > > > > On Mar 29, 5:47 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Actually Gabby I do not see how you arrive at the me myself and I? > > > > > first of > > > > > all I am not the one who originated the statement or concept of the > > > > > spherical-cube.. and I feel in reality it is not even worthy of > > > > > contemplation.. but it got stuck in my head anyway and an answer > > > > > arrived > > > > > whether it was needed or not. I guess it is in my make up to be a > > > > > transcendentalist* so I am not surprised by an answer showing up. > > > > > *** > > > > > The ME ME ME opera is reserved for self-centred people who do not > > > > > care about > > > > > the well being of others or society, only for themselves. If you > > > > > feel that > > > > > I am deceiving myself you actually are right in away because I have > > > > > found a > > > > > hill within me that allows me to deal with a traumatised life some of > > > > > it > > > > > self inflicted some by others.. > > > > > > well as for me.. I will continue inside my delusion of calm and peace > > > > > were I > > > > > do not have to deal with the raging anger within.. and yes there are > > > > > professional people who actually know all about me with nothing > > > > > hidden. > > > > > Allan > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:35 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Ah! That's why you criticise the ME-ME-ME opera whereas all I hear > > > > > > is > > > > > > the me-myself-I. What you call playing on semantics is what I see as > > > > > > self-deception, which has a lot to do with reality. Interesting > > > > > > point. ;-) > > > > > > > On 29 Mrz., 09:53, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Can God create a spherical - cube? A foolish questions that is > > > > > > > playing on > > > > > > > semantics to try and create an illusionary point. Even a foolish > > > > > > > question > > > > > > > sometimes deserves an answer. As crazy as it sounds the answer is > > > > > > Yes..God > > > > > > > can create a spherical-cube. lol it actually is not difficult to > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > either.. > > > > > > > > I think statements like that are needed to boost a persons ego > > > > > > > (easing > > > > > > God > > > > > > > out) and have little to with reality.. It all has to do with how > > > > > > > you view > > > > > > > the subject. > > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > ( > > > > > > > ) > > > > > > > I_D Allan > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > > Groups > > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group. > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > > > > > .com> > > > > > > . > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > > > ( > > > > > ) > > > > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
