Personally I thnk God is what makes for a decent living, but that is
strictly a personal concept and not one I expect others to follow or
believe. To me God is what makes life worth living and interesting.

Pat said in one of his earlier statement that God could not create a
spherical cube and because he could not do that he was limited.
Allan

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:44 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:

> I can take god as a convention for decent living Allan.
>
> On 5 Apr, 07:16, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I totally agree with you but unfortunately it is part of a God defining
> > attribute.
> > Allan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:28 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Shape is only a convention in geometry, geometry itself conventional.
> > > No need for god or Glasgow.
> >
> > > On 1 Apr, 15:49, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > LMAO! That's a fine one gabby!
> >
> > > > On Apr 1, 9:27 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > I saw the picture, too, but didn't find it difficult to see the
> > > > > objects as part of a 3D scenario. Join us over at Gravity, too, and
> > > > > see what I mean. No strings attached. *laughing*
> >
> > > > > On 1 Apr., 15:07, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On 29 Mar, 16:44, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > I would say most of mine was self inflicted! I also have found
> that
> > > > > > > hill. as for a spherical cube, it is more than possible, it is
> > > proven!
> >
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > www.math.ias.edu/~arao/pubs/tiling.pdf<http://www.math.ias.edu/%7Earao/pubs/tiling.pdf>
> <http://www.math.ias.edu/%7Earao/pubs/tiling.pdf>
> >
> > > > > > I followed your directions of typing in the link and was able to
> see
> > > > > > the pdf file.  The only picture it displays is a 2-D splay of
> circles
> > > > > > and rounded circular things inside a square.  Hardly convincing,
> as
> > > > > > both a sphere and a cube are 3-D objects.
> >
> > > > > > However, if I take up the argument and agree that the authors
> have
> > > > > > 'proven' that such a sphereical cube can exist, it demanded the
> > > > > > existence of more than just 3 spatial dimensions, so, it would
> mean
> > > > > > that, if God CAN make a sphereical cube, He would have to do so
> in a
> > > > > > universe that has more dimensions than those recognised by the
> > > > > > Standard Model or Quantum Mechanics, and THAT, my friends, lends
> more
> > > > > > credence to String Theory as being the truth of our universe.
>  So, If
> > > > > > I give in and agree with the authors, then it only backs up MY
> > > > > > proposition that String Theory is the truth.  So...thanks for
> that,
> > > as
> > > > > > it, if anything, lends credence to my own theories.  ;-)
> >
> > > > > > > On Mar 29, 5:47 am, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Actually Gabby I do not see how you arrive at the me myself
> and
> > > I?  first of
> > > > > > > > all I am not the one who originated the statement or concept
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > > > spherical-cube.. and I feel in reality  it is not even worthy
> of
> > > > > > > > contemplation..  but it got stuck in my head anyway and  an
> > > answer arrived
> > > > > > > > whether it was needed or not. I guess it is in my make up to
> be a
> > > > > > > > transcendentalist* so I am not surprised by an answer showing
> up.
> > > > > > > > ***
> > > > > > > > The ME ME ME opera is reserved for self-centred people who do
> not
> > > care about
> > > > > > > > the well being of others or society, only for themselves.  If
> you
> > > feel that
> > > > > > > > I am deceiving myself  you actually are right in away because
> I
> > > have found a
> > > > > > > > hill within me that allows me to deal with a traumatised life
> > > some of it
> > > > > > > > self inflicted some by others..
> >
> > > > > > > > well as for me.. I will continue inside my delusion of calm
> and
> > > peace were I
> > > > > > > > do not have to deal with the raging anger within..  and yes
> > >  there are
> > > > > > > > professional people who actually know all about me with
> nothing
> > > hidden.
> > > > > > > > Allan
> >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:35 AM, gabbydott <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Ah! That's why you criticise the ME-ME-ME opera whereas all
> I
> > > hear is
> > > > > > > > > the me-myself-I. What you call playing on semantics is what
> I
> > > see as
> > > > > > > > > self-deception, which has a lot to do with reality.
> Interesting
> > > > > > > > > point. ;-)
> >
> > > > > > > > > On 29 Mrz., 09:53, iam deheretic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Can God create a spherical - cube? A foolish questions
> that
> > > is playing on
> > > > > > > > > > semantics to try and create an illusionary point. Even a
> > > foolish question
> > > > > > > > > > sometimes deserves an answer. As crazy as it sounds the
> > > answer is
> > > > > > > > > Yes..God
> > > > > > > > > > can create a spherical-cube. lol  it actually is not
> > > difficult to do
> > > > > > > > > > either..
> >
> > > > > > > > > > I think statements like that are needed to boost a
> persons
> > > ego (easing
> > > > > > > > > God
> > > > > > > > > > out) and have little to with reality.. It all has to do
> with
> > > how you view
> > > > > > > > > > the subject.
> > > > > > > > > > Allan
> >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > (
> > > > > > > > > >  )
> > > > > > > > > > I_D Allan
> >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > > Google Groups
> > > > > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > [email protected].
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups ­­­.com>
> > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
> >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > (
> > > > > > > >  )
> > > > > > > > I_D Allan- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > (
> >  )
> > I_D Allan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<minds-eye%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
(
 )
I_D Allan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to