"exclusive oneness" - interesting notion, but not what I experience.
Inclusive would be the word I use.

On Apr 24, 10:36 am, [email protected] wrote:
>  What is this thing with oneness? Of course we are one in many senses of this 
> term. But we are all individuals and different as well. Doesn't that count 
> for something? Even in the oneness - individuals experience it through their 
> individual selves. I serious doubt if my sense of oneness is universally 
> experienced the same way as all others. Those who share a passionate 
> conviction that their particular point of view is the only point of view in 
> town being the most perfect experience a sense of exclusive oneness. For 
> others who do not share their particular slant oneness is I think different. 
> No?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Molly <[email protected]>
> To: "Minds Eye" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sat, Apr 24, 2010 10:17 am
> Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Some Clarity
>
> perhaps you are feeling the oneness common to all...
>
> On Apr 24, 9:43 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > what about the feeling you get about some people... they are very
> > familiar but the fact is you never met them before...i dont mean it in
> > the sense that you have a lot in common with them... its the feeling
> > of having known.. its really bizzare
>
> > On Apr 19, 4:19 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > One can ascertain the future-somewhat- based on probability but as the
> > > human species is prone to habit and delusion, it rarely takes this as
> > > an advantage beforehand but instead smugly watched events unfold and
> > > declares, "I KNEW this would happen!",etc. This is, imho, in part a
> > > protective element in our psyches or an early coping mechanism that
> > > refuses to abate or unsnarl. It is a form of denial, of course.
>
> > > On Apr 19, 5:25 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On 16 Apr, 17:08, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > It is not the future which binds us , even though it is very well
> > > > > extant ; it is the past and the present which make up our nature.  We
> > > > > act and react in the environment according to our nature and as the
> > > > > environment itself is an unfolding of the cosmos everything is certain
> > > > > and all the choices of will though free  are yet subtly bound.
>
> > > > Whilst I see what you're saying, we are bound by those events which
> > > > are, relatively, events of our own future.  You're correct that our
> > > > 'nature' enters into this and binds us in programmatical ways, as does
> > > > our nurture, but the overarching bind is performed by those acts/
> > > > events which are extant in space-time.  Those acts which are in space-
> > > > time WILL be performed, those that are not, will not be (with respect
> > > > to the past, those events which HAVE happened, have happened, and
> > > > those which did not, did not).  The 'unfolding' of the cosmos is only
> > > > an apparent unfolding due to our existing on that very edge of the
> > > > expansion of space-time, which is the only place where movement (in
> > > > the form of its expansion) of space-time exists, thus the only place
> > > > available where experiences can 'occur'.  The rest of the events are
> > > > either locked into the past or locked into the future.  Only at that
> > > > 'edge of expansion' can we perceive a movement of space-time, thus, a
> > > > perception of a flow to time and the perception of spatial objects
> > > > moving through space.  All our 'choices' are simply events.  And those
> > > > events in the future are incalculable, thus shrouded in mystery and,
> > > > apparently 'free'.  But those events are just as extant as any in the
> > > > past.  The difference is that we have some access to past events via
> > > > memory.  Yet, our memories can be faulty and we never remember things
> > > > down to the quantum level, so they serve as only a rough guide rather
> > > > than a decent predictor.  And, none of us have access to the entirety
> > > > of space-time that has passed, thus preventing us from ever accurately
> > > > predicting the future.
>
> > > > > On Apr 16, 4:58 am, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 14 Apr, 20:21, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > We are free to think and act but our choice is bound subtly to
> > > > > > > motivating forces within and outside us.
>
> > > > > > Moreso by the Space-time continuum itself, as it contains, by
> > > > > > definition, ALL of space and time with nothing missing.  Thus, the
> > > > > > future is just as much extant as is the past; the difference is that
> > > > > > we have a 'memory' of the past but have no such devise that allows 
> > > > > > us
> > > > > > to view the future.  Imagine what we would think of free will if we
> > > > > > had access to the future but none to the past.  Or just no access
> > > > > > either way.  Time-blindedness affects us in very subtle ways and our
> > > > > > lack of ability to see into the future makes us believe that the
> > > > > > future is not extant or 'fixed' yet.  But that was debunked by 
> > > > > > Special
> > > > > > Relativity in 1905.  It's a shame that most of humanity refuses to
> > > > > > accept the philosophical implications of SR.
>
> > > > > > I would re-word your statement above to read: (It appears that) we 
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > free to think and act but our choice is bound (by the events already
> > > > > > extant in the space-time continuum).
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 13, 6:04 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Everything we do is predetermined?  That is cow dung at its 
> > > > > > > > best.
>
> > > > > > > > We have choice, the world is totally diverse, while some are 
> > > > > > > > into
> mass
> > > > > > > > killing others are into basking in the warm sun on a tropical
> beach.
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 13, 11:33 am, RP <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Everything we do  is predetermined, but we are the agents and 
> > > > > > > > > as
> such
> > > > > > > > > what all of us are doing is changing and shaping the future. 
> > > > > > > > > All
> the
> > > > > > > > > sciences are a result of human endeavour, if people are
> prolonging
> > > > > > > > > death through bypass surgery and the rest it is due to 
> > > > > > > > > concerted
> > > > > > > > > action. For any cogent action a basic belief that we are free 
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > required, then only can there be zest and enthusiasm in life. 
> > > > > > > > > It
> is
> > > > > > > > > only when we cosider ourselves to be free that we can hold
> anyone to
> > > > > > > > > be accountable , otherwise there is no sense in life. No 
> > > > > > > > > matter
> how
> > > > > > > > > much bound a person considers himself to be , he is happy in 
> > > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > triumphs and sad in his failures.My will may be bound but 
> > > > > > > > > when I
> > > > > > > > > act ,  it is I who am acting and thus to all intents and
> purposes I am
> > > > > > > > > free. What all the individuals are doing today is deciding the
> future
> > > > > > > > > to a very large extent.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 12, 11:36 pm, ornamentalmind 
> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > “i think it works both ways....we alter the 'cause' and so
> alter the
> > > > > > > > > > 'effect'....” – PSK
>
> > > > > > > > > > At first glance, I rebel at the notion PSK. Yet, perhaps if
> you broke
> > > > > > > > > > it down somewhat…and showed us exactly how this works, I 
> > > > > > > > > > might
> be able
> > > > > > > > > > to change my view.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Today I was contemplating this very thing. I found that it 
> > > > > > > > > > was
> not my
> > > > > > > > > > will that caused my body to be born. Nor was it my will to
> invent the
> > > > > > > > > > very language nor any of the words or concepts we are using 
> > > > > > > > > > in
> this
> > > > > > > > > > discussion either. It is not my will to even survive…even
> though this
> > > > > > > > > > too is ‘innate’ in the sense that an organism’s function is 
> > > > > > > > > > to
> live
> > > > > > > > > > and survive.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Many (me included) embrace the notion that at “the 
> > > > > > > > > > beginning”
> > > > > > > > > > everything was set in motion and all was and is 
> > > > > > > > > > predetermined.
> Yes,
> > > > > > > > > > this is only one form of teleology, but it’s apropos to our
> current
> > > > > > > > > > discussion.
>
> > > > > > > > > > So, again, perhaps some unpacking of how ‘we’ in fact do 
> > > > > > > > > > stuff
> i.e.
> > > > > > > > > > “alter the ‘cause’”, OK? Thanks
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Apr 12, 10:11 pm, "pol.science kid" 
> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > i think it works both ways....we alter the 'cause' and so
> alter the
> > > > > > > > > > > 'effect'....
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:49 PM, ornamentalmind
> > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > So PSK, you believe that there is no cause and
> effect?...that somehow
> > > > > > > > > > > > 'we' can actually change the apparent progression of
> events?
> > > > > > > > > > > > Interesting....
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 1:20 am, "pol.science kid" 
> > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > all your posts seem to say one thing " nothings new..
> wat has been...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > has been and will be" ... kind of
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 5, 6:29 pm, ornamentalmind 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > “…which makes us enemies of each other The state is
> now bigger than us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mortal beings…” – PSK
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yet again, I just don’t see it. How is ‘the state’
> bigger today than
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in, say, the days of Rome?...of ancient Egypt? And,
> I’m not so sure it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > has to do with size either. I’m guessing the issue 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is
> perceived
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > power. . . which, again, I just don’t see as being 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > any
> more or less
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > than has been reported in the past
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 5, 6:56 am, "pol.science kid"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the last post an evolved Mind was being
> discussed…here’s what I
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.

Reply via email to