A different view of what the website home of "Minds Eye" is or was. OK. Point taken.
On May 2, 11:52 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Heh. That was the website home of Minds Eye, featuring article and fiction > content from more than a few of the contributors here. I dunno about > commercial interests. I never even made enough in banner clicks to pay for > the site hosting. > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:42 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > The link to your dubious website. > > > On 2 Mai, 23:07, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Self commercial interests? Refresh my memory. > > > > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:24 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sigh, how life was simple here when Vam was still one, Chris had his > > > > self-commercial interests linked in his signature and Molly silently > > > > had content produced for her blog ... > > > > > On 1 Mai, 06:38, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You still here Vam singing your Swan Song? lol > > > > > > You are totally a hopeless romantic dude! > > > > > > WTF? wow vam that be a harsh expression coming from such a passive as > > > > > you. > > > > > > I wouldn't think that you ever suspected but I have a trace element > > of > > > > > Punjab within me. > > > > > > Fact is I have much more within me which gives me the right to play > > > > > with those who share what is within me. > > > > > > Truthfully though I do like to mess with people and truthfully I love > > > > > everyone, with a few exceptions. > > > > > > Life for me is a playground. > > > > > > On Apr 30, 3:59 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks, Chris, it did. > > > > > > > WTF, now Google has pulled out both my blogs. Or, is it ... what ? > > > > > > Damn it. > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 7:21 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > It's fine:http://www.gravity.com/MindsEye > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:18 PM, vamadevananda < > > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > No, that was a call to wilderness ... for the echo, if not a > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > On Apr 28, 5:48 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Are you talking to me? > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 28, 2:16 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Is Gravity crashed or is it banned by Lord Google ? Hello > > ... > > > > > > > > > > anybody ... > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 3:10 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah, just the other way round! Far too often I am cold, > > that's > > > > why I > > > > > > > > > > > love the sun. And I value rules more than wanting to > > teach > > > > how to > > > > > > > > > > > break them. Plus my head circumference is too large for > > my > > > > height. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 9:46 am, vamadevananda <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gabby, dear, ME already has a lot more than Gravity, in > > > > terms of > > > > > > > > > > > > culture and interpersonal relatedness. Gravity might > > too, > > > > but in > > > > > > > > > > > > future, if it would. > > > > > > > > > > > > > As of now, Gravity is an unknown club I've just joined. > > ME > > > > is > > > > > > > > already > > > > > > > > > > > > known, with an established focus on discussions proper. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just saw the picture of yours more closely. Are you > > really > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > beautiful, playful and warm ? Your barbs on ME would > > leave > > > > such a > > > > > > > > > > > > contrary image ! Donna used to compensate somewhat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 3:00 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "I actually found talking Gravity in ME as doing the > > > > immiscible > > > > > > > > !" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure you are right but don't understand why. My > > > > listening > > > > > > > > > > > > > comprehension ain't that developped yet. I see that > > using > > > > ME in > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gravity is allowed to be discussed over there. Which > > part > > > > am I > > > > > > > > > > > > > missing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18 Mrz., 14:06, vamadevananda < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's are a couple of impolite but exact words > > for > > > > what I > > > > > > > > understand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of your post, Gabby. It's : bitching, a poke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I actually found talking Gravity in ME as doing the > > > > immiscible > > > > > > > > ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My last post was to state that emotions are not > > > > optional. And > > > > > > > > that, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there a continuity including our self, values, > > ideas > > > > through > > > > > > > > emotion, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to action. Rational things may then be spread, let > > > > recognition > > > > > > > > happen. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One must want before having something to say, > > whether > > > > in > > > > > > > > agreement or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not. That makes a group. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Technically, the social networking platforms have > > much > > > > > > > > infrastructure. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But not a fraction of the relatedness I've found on > > ME. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 2:19 pm, gabbydott <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow, Vam, you surprise me! I would have thought > > you > > > > were the > > > > > > > > first to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > embrace the renewed "ALL ' accepted ' members" > > policy > > > > over at > > > > > > > > Gravity! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Transformation up to a level of pure conciseness! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 17, 9:29 pm, vamadevananda < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These days, ME seems to be without > > protagonists, > > > > the likes > > > > > > > > of which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > created and participated in such lively > > threads, > > > > many of > > > > > > > > which I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > myself partook in from around Sept 2007. I have > > > > always > > > > > > > > valued it, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks to KC and all those brilliant people > > who'd > > > > > > > > congregate. Often, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it would keep me sane, cause to cheer me up, > > and > > > > leave me > > > > > > > > wondrous. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know quite a few from the era outgrew the > > > > platform and > > > > > > > > have since > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > moved on to other things. There's never a day, > > > > however, > > > > > > > > when I have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not been to it, at least once, in the hope of > > > > reading > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > amazingly honest, authentic, true, logical, > > poetic, > > > > > > > > beautiful, well > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > crafted, doubting, inclusive, new, or some such > > > > criterion > > > > > > > > that is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > largely belied in our everyday experience with > > > > people, > > > > > > > > their concerns, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thoughts and preoccupations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely was a sense of oneness, > > > > characterised by > > > > > > > > this respect > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we had for ALL ' accepted ' members, despite > > very > > > > sharp and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > irreconcilable differences among them. The > > hunger > > > > and drive > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > articulate our position and our responses did > > the > > > > rest. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking of creativity, the standard was well > > nigh > > > > high and > > > > > > > > I often > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > felt spoilt for the choices there, like so many > > > > doorways to > > > > > > > > substance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and delight ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All said and done, I could always walk along in > > > > friendship, > > > > > > > > hand in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hand with others, theists and atheists and all > > in > > > > between, > > > > > > > > dualists > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and non - dualists and everyone else ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 6:06 pm, Pat < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4 Mar, 17:19, vamadevananda < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Pat ! Between you and me, let > > oneness > > > > alone > > > > > > > > reign. We both owe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to IT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {chuckle} Oneness could only reign alone and > > > > it's not > > > > > > > > within my power > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (or any of the 'seeming many') to add or > > detract > > > > from > > > > > > > > that oneness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, I DO get what you mean, ;-) Not only > > do we > > > > owe to > > > > > > > > it, there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no other to which we could owe, for there is > > no > > > > other, > > > > > > > > much less, is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there no other like that One. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 6:25 pm, Pat < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb, 22:53, Vamadevananda < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is important to me, saying good > > bye to > > > > people > > > > > > > > who I was looking > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for but who I did not know existed > > before > > > > I'd met > > > > > > > > them on this forum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They'll remain with me, trans space and > > > > time and > > > > > > > > communication. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's been a pleasure, all the way, not > > ... > > read more »
