It's fine: http://www.gravity.com/MindsEye
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:18 PM, vamadevananda <[email protected]>wrote: > No, that was a call to wilderness ... for the echo, if not a response. > > On Apr 28, 5:48 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you talking to me? > > > > On Apr 28, 2:16 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is Gravity crashed or is it banned by Lord Google ? Hello ... > > > anybody ... > > > > > On Mar 19, 3:10 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Ah, just the other way round! Far too often I am cold, that's why I > > > > love the sun. And I value rules more than wanting to teach how to > > > > break them. Plus my head circumference is too large for my height. > > > > > > On Mar 19, 9:46 am, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Gabby, dear, ME already has a lot more than Gravity, in terms of > > > > > culture and interpersonal relatedness. Gravity might too, but in > > > > > future, if it would. > > > > > > > As of now, Gravity is an unknown club I've just joined. ME is > already > > > > > known, with an established focus on discussions proper. > > > > > > > Just saw the picture of yours more closely. Are you really as > > > > > beautiful, playful and warm ? Your barbs on ME would leave such a > > > > > contrary image ! Donna used to compensate somewhat. > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 3:00 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > "I actually found talking Gravity in ME as doing the immiscible > !" > > > > > > > > I am sure you are right but don't understand why. My listening > > > > > > comprehension ain't that developped yet. I see that using ME in > > > > > > Gravity is allowed to be discussed over there. Which part am I > > > > > > missing? > > > > > > > > On 18 Mrz., 14:06, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > There's are a couple of impolite but exact words for what I > understand > > > > > > > of your post, Gabby. It's : bitching, a poke. > > > > > > > > > I actually found talking Gravity in ME as doing the immiscible > ! > > > > > > > > > My last post was to state that emotions are not optional. And > that, > > > > > > > there a continuity including our self, values, ideas through > emotion, > > > > > > > to action. Rational things may then be spread, let recognition > happen. > > > > > > > One must want before having something to say, whether in > agreement or > > > > > > > not. That makes a group. > > > > > > > > > Technically, the social networking platforms have much > infrastructure. > > > > > > > But not a fraction of the relatedness I've found on ME. > > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 2:19 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Wow, Vam, you surprise me! I would have thought you were the > first to > > > > > > > > embrace the renewed "ALL ' accepted ' members" policy over at > Gravity! > > > > > > > > Transformation up to a level of pure conciseness! > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 17, 9:29 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > These days, ME seems to be without protagonists, the likes > of which > > > > > > > > > created and participated in such lively threads, many of > which I > > > > > > > > > myself partook in from around Sept 2007. I have always > valued it, > > > > > > > > > thanks to KC and all those brilliant people who'd > congregate. Often, > > > > > > > > > it would keep me sane, cause to cheer me up, and leave me > wondrous. > > > > > > > > > > > I know quite a few from the era outgrew the platform and > have since > > > > > > > > > moved on to other things. There's never a day, however, > when I have > > > > > > > > > not been to it, at least once, in the hope of reading > something > > > > > > > > > amazingly honest, authentic, true, logical, poetic, > beautiful, well > > > > > > > > > crafted, doubting, inclusive, new, or some such criterion > that is > > > > > > > > > largely belied in our everyday experience with people, > their concerns, > > > > > > > > > thoughts and preoccupations. > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely was a sense of oneness, characterised by > this respect > > > > > > > > > we had for ALL ' accepted ' members, despite very sharp and > > > > > > > > > irreconcilable differences among them. The hunger and drive > to > > > > > > > > > articulate our position and our responses did the rest. > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking of creativity, the standard was well nigh high and > I often > > > > > > > > > felt spoilt for the choices there, like so many doorways to > substance > > > > > > > > > and delight ! > > > > > > > > > > > All said and done, I could always walk along in friendship, > hand in > > > > > > > > > hand with others, theists and atheists and all in between, > dualists > > > > > > > > > and non - dualists and everyone else ! > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 6:06 pm, Pat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4 Mar, 17:19, vamadevananda <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Pat ! Between you and me, let oneness alone > reign. We both owe > > > > > > > > > > > to IT. > > > > > > > > > > > > {chuckle} Oneness could only reign alone and it's not > within my power > > > > > > > > > > (or any of the 'seeming many') to add or detract from > that oneness. > > > > > > > > > > But, I DO get what you mean, ;-) Not only do we owe to > it, there is > > > > > > > > > > no other to which we could owe, for there is no other, > much less, is > > > > > > > > > > there no other like that One. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 6:25 pm, Pat <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb, 22:53, Vamadevananda < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is important to me, saying good bye to people > who I was looking > > > > > > > > > > > > > for but who I did not know existed before I'd met > them on this forum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > They'll remain with me, trans space and time and > communication. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's been a pleasure, all the way, not only with > those who I am > > > > > > > > > > > > > supposedly partial to but also with those who I am > allegedly partial > > > > > > > > > > > > > against. Much like what I said to a friend this > weekend, who seemed > > > > > > > > > > > > > astonished at the way I conducted him on the > highway to Rohtak : I > > > > > > > > > > > > > may be perceived as being overcautious or a shade > ambitious, even > > > > > > > > > > > > > rash ... but all that was happening was that I was > being comfortable > > > > > > > > > > > > > with myself, being equally true to my weaknesses > and my faults as to > > > > > > > > > > > > > my strengths and my forte. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, the herbs ( what kind of a word is ' weeds,' > in comparison, in > > > > > > > > > > > > > reference to the same thing ! ) and soma included > ... I can choose to > > > > > > > > > > > > > be demolishingly competitive on the road, when I > want to put someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > in his place, or disarmingly on a forum for the > civilised if I am > > > > > > > > > > > > > seeking a friend. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The truth is : I've just been a kid all the time > because I have been > > > > > > > > > > > > > blissful and blessed all the time, below the adult > or parent > > > > > > > > > > > > > projections I deliberately form to cover it up > with, because I find > > > > > > > > > > > > > the others are not as blissful enough ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have not made much headway with the social > networking sites. But > > > > > > > > > > > > > Buzz seems easy. And I'll be taking on much of my > posts here onto a > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog on Wordpress.com, hopefully linked to a page > in a website I shall > > > > > > > > > > > > > commission shortly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll sneak in from time to time ... it's > irresistible, you know ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > and it will never be that a personal mail shall > remain without a > > > > > > > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I owe you a lot, Vam. I've no doubt that, > without your help, I > > > > > > > > > > > > wouldn't be where I am today. All the best in all > you do!! You can't > > > > > > > > > > > > really go all that far, these days, anyway. > Especially if you're > > > > > > > > > > > > pointing us to where you can be found. May Brahman > choose wisely for > > > > > > > > > > > > you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kindest Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pat- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - >
