Self commercial interests? Refresh my memory. On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:24 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sigh, how life was simple here when Vam was still one, Chris had his > self-commercial interests linked in his signature and Molly silently > had content produced for her blog ... > > On 1 Mai, 06:38, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > You still here Vam singing your Swan Song? lol > > > > You are totally a hopeless romantic dude! > > > > WTF? wow vam that be a harsh expression coming from such a passive as > > you. > > > > I wouldn't think that you ever suspected but I have a trace element of > > Punjab within me. > > > > Fact is I have much more within me which gives me the right to play > > with those who share what is within me. > > > > Truthfully though I do like to mess with people and truthfully I love > > everyone, with a few exceptions. > > > > Life for me is a playground. > > > > On Apr 30, 3:59 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks, Chris, it did. > > > > > WTF, now Google has pulled out both my blogs. Or, is it ... what ? > > > Damn it. > > > > > On Apr 29, 7:21 pm, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > It's fine:http://www.gravity.com/MindsEye > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:18 PM, vamadevananda < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > No, that was a call to wilderness ... for the echo, if not a > response. > > > > > > > On Apr 28, 5:48 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Are you talking to me? > > > > > > > > On Apr 28, 2:16 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is Gravity crashed or is it banned by Lord Google ? Hello ... > > > > > > > anybody ... > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 3:10 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ah, just the other way round! Far too often I am cold, that's > why I > > > > > > > > love the sun. And I value rules more than wanting to teach > how to > > > > > > > > break them. Plus my head circumference is too large for my > height. > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 9:46 am, vamadevananda <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Gabby, dear, ME already has a lot more than Gravity, in > terms of > > > > > > > > > culture and interpersonal relatedness. Gravity might too, > but in > > > > > > > > > future, if it would. > > > > > > > > > > > As of now, Gravity is an unknown club I've just joined. ME > is > > > > > already > > > > > > > > > known, with an established focus on discussions proper. > > > > > > > > > > > Just saw the picture of yours more closely. Are you really > as > > > > > > > > > beautiful, playful and warm ? Your barbs on ME would leave > such a > > > > > > > > > contrary image ! Donna used to compensate somewhat. > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 19, 3:00 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > "I actually found talking Gravity in ME as doing the > immiscible > > > > > !" > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure you are right but don't understand why. My > listening > > > > > > > > > > comprehension ain't that developped yet. I see that using > ME in > > > > > > > > > > Gravity is allowed to be discussed over there. Which part > am I > > > > > > > > > > missing? > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18 Mrz., 14:06, vamadevananda <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's are a couple of impolite but exact words for > what I > > > > > understand > > > > > > > > > > > of your post, Gabby. It's : bitching, a poke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I actually found talking Gravity in ME as doing the > immiscible > > > > > ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > My last post was to state that emotions are not > optional. And > > > > > that, > > > > > > > > > > > there a continuity including our self, values, ideas > through > > > > > emotion, > > > > > > > > > > > to action. Rational things may then be spread, let > recognition > > > > > happen. > > > > > > > > > > > One must want before having something to say, whether > in > > > > > agreement or > > > > > > > > > > > not. That makes a group. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Technically, the social networking platforms have much > > > > > infrastructure. > > > > > > > > > > > But not a fraction of the relatedness I've found on ME. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 2:19 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow, Vam, you surprise me! I would have thought you > were the > > > > > first to > > > > > > > > > > > > embrace the renewed "ALL ' accepted ' members" policy > over at > > > > > Gravity! > > > > > > > > > > > > Transformation up to a level of pure conciseness! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 17, 9:29 pm, vamadevananda < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These days, ME seems to be without protagonists, > the likes > > > > > of which > > > > > > > > > > > > > created and participated in such lively threads, > many of > > > > > which I > > > > > > > > > > > > > myself partook in from around Sept 2007. I have > always > > > > > valued it, > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks to KC and all those brilliant people who'd > > > > > congregate. Often, > > > > > > > > > > > > > it would keep me sane, cause to cheer me up, and > leave me > > > > > wondrous. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know quite a few from the era outgrew the > platform and > > > > > have since > > > > > > > > > > > > > moved on to other things. There's never a day, > however, > > > > > when I have > > > > > > > > > > > > > not been to it, at least once, in the hope of > reading > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > > amazingly honest, authentic, true, logical, poetic, > > > > > beautiful, well > > > > > > > > > > > > > crafted, doubting, inclusive, new, or some such > criterion > > > > > that is > > > > > > > > > > > > > largely belied in our everyday experience with > people, > > > > > their concerns, > > > > > > > > > > > > > thoughts and preoccupations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There definitely was a sense of oneness, > characterised by > > > > > this respect > > > > > > > > > > > > > we had for ALL ' accepted ' members, despite very > sharp and > > > > > > > > > > > > > irreconcilable differences among them. The hunger > and drive > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > articulate our position and our responses did the > rest. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Speaking of creativity, the standard was well nigh > high and > > > > > I often > > > > > > > > > > > > > felt spoilt for the choices there, like so many > doorways to > > > > > substance > > > > > > > > > > > > > and delight ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All said and done, I could always walk along in > friendship, > > > > > hand in > > > > > > > > > > > > > hand with others, theists and atheists and all in > between, > > > > > dualists > > > > > > > > > > > > > and non - dualists and everyone else ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 6:06 pm, Pat < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4 Mar, 17:19, vamadevananda < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Pat ! Between you and me, let oneness > alone > > > > > reign. We both owe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to IT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {chuckle} Oneness could only reign alone and > it's not > > > > > within my power > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (or any of the 'seeming many') to add or detract > from > > > > > that oneness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, I DO get what you mean, ;-) Not only do we > owe to > > > > > it, there is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no other to which we could owe, for there is no > other, > > > > > much less, is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there no other like that One. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 6:25 pm, Pat < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 14 Feb, 22:53, Vamadevananda < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is important to me, saying good bye to > people > > > > > who I was looking > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for but who I did not know existed before > I'd met > > > > > them on this forum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They'll remain with me, trans space and > time and > > > > > communication. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's been a pleasure, all the way, not only > with > > > > > those who I am > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > supposedly partial to but also with those > who I am > > > > > allegedly partial > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against. Much like what I said to a friend > this > > > > > weekend, who seemed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > astonished at the way I conducted him on > the > > > > > highway to Rohtak : I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > may be perceived as being overcautious or a > shade > > > > > ambitious, even > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rash ... but all that was happening was > that I was > > > > > being comfortable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with myself, being equally true to my > weaknesses > > > > > and my faults as to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my strengths and my forte. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, the herbs ( what kind of a word is ' > weeds,' > > > > > in comparison, in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reference to the same thing ! ) and soma > included > > > > > ... I can choose to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be demolishingly competitive on the road, > when I > > > > > want to put someone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in his place, or disarmingly on a forum for > the > > > > > civilised if I am > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seeking a friend. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The truth is : I've just been a kid all the > time > > > > > because I have been > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blissful and blessed all the time, below > the adult > > > > > or parent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > projections I deliberately form to cover it > up > > > > > with, because I find > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the others are not as blissful enough ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have not made much headway with the > social > > > > > networking sites. But > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Buzz seems easy. And I'll be taking on much > of my > > > > > posts here onto a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blog on Wordpress.com, hopefully linked to > a page > > > > > in a website I shall > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commission shortly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll sneak in from time to time ... it's > > > > > irresistible, you know ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and it will never be that a personal mail > shall > > > > > remain without a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > response. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I owe you a lot, Vam. I've no doubt > that, > > > > > without your help, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wouldn't be where I am today. All the best > in all > > > > > you do!! You can't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > really go all that far, these > > > > ... > > > > Erfahren Sie mehr ยป >
