FF, you have challenged Darwin's theory of evolution. May you enlighten me
with YOUR theory? How did man come to be? Was this universe put in place,
as it is , or has it evolved over billions of years?

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On May 16, 7:26 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The ball of elaboration is in your court, this is your thread.   You
> > are making broad statements without saying much.
> >
> > You see agnostics as having a "problem" because you have anchored
> > yourself within your personal set of beliefs that you consider
> > truths.
> >
> I have already mentioned that there is nothing personal about TRUTH &
> that is what the term "Absolute Truth" means. It is absolute in every
> respect. It neither depends upon my personal beliefs nor upon the
> collective opinion of masses. For example, a herd of zombies can go on
> shouting that Evolution Theory is a scientific theory. But only your
> strong urge to unearth the Truth will tell you that there is no
> evidence whatsoever to prove the absurd claims made in that silly
> theory. This also means that you can't project something unreasonable
> as Absolute Truth. Anything that is not in line with logic, reason or
> common sense will NOT be recognized as Absolute Truth. Having a strong
> scientific temper is minimum requirement to understand Absolute Truth.
> So, agnostic should NOT be under the impression that they are the
> whole & sole defenders of scientific temper. What you know in the
> field of tangible science is already known to today's gnostics. In
> addition, gnostics know something which appears to be of abstract
> nature to many agnostics.
>
> > While issues can be linked to each other they can also be explored
> > individually.
> >
> > I don't see the thread going anywhere other than reaching levels of
> > redundancy without resolution.
> >
>     When agnostics reject the existence of "Absolute Truth", they do
> so without knowing anything about that term. How can you reject
> something about which you know nothing ? It is this "Absolute Truth"
> which can throw light upon the seemingly inexplicable force behind
> uncertainties around us. But your urge to deny the existence of God
> simply prompts you to reject the very existence of any such
> inexplicable force. Your approach Is very much in line with the
> mindset of determinists. In that case you cannot reject Hegel's
> statement that History develops as per the logical plan. So, should I
> assume that you accept Hegel's views regarding development of
> history ?
>
> > I'm with Albert Einstein below.
> >
> > Borrowed FROM:
> > Molly Brogan Thread May 26, 2008
> >
> > According to Plato:  When the mind's eye rests on objects illuminated
> > by truth and reality, it understands and comprehends them, and
> > functions intelligently; but when it turns to the twilight world of
> > change and decay, it can only form opinions, its vision is confused
> > and its beliefs shifting, and it seems to lack intelligence. (Plato,
> > Republic)
> >
>     It is obvious that any philosophy must be capable of explaining
> ALL the events that take place in the system in which we exist.
>
> > To Spinoza, ultimate truth is the ultimate reality of a rationally
> > ordered system that is God.
> >
> > To Hegel, truth is a rationally integrated
> > system in which everything is contained.
> >
> > To Einstein, “the truth of
> > the Universe is human truth.”
> >
> > Read More @
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye/browse_thread/thread/8531f4e...
>  >
> > On May 16, 6:37 am, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 16, 11:02 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:> Thank You!
> >
> > > > I understand it all very well and did not discredit anything.
> >
> > > > I simply recognized a multi-faceted post which needs clarification on
> > > > some specifics.
> >
> > > Only a multi-faceted post can clearly highlight the wholistic
> > > approach.> Truth IS that Truth is highly subjective even in the sense
> of
> > > > absolutism, somewhat like absolute "fact".
> >
> > > Calling Truth as subjective matter is part of empiricism. Our
> > > perception about Reality can be quite different from Absolute Truth.
> > > That doesn't mean Absolute Truth does not exist.> The Wow really
> belongs as a pertinence to your own opening thread
> > > > which covers several issues.
> >
> > > All the isues covered in that post are linked to each other. You
> > > cannot separate one from the other.> We've covered the truth issue here
> many times before so you might
> > > > consider searching the Minds Eye archives.
> >
> > > The problem with agnostics is that they cannot see anything beyond
> > > public opinion or collective opinion. Truth can be (& most of the
> > > times it is) different from collective opinion.
> >
> > > > Have a good e-space night!
> >
> > > Now again the e-space illusion has come into picture. We are from
> > > different time zones. What is night for you is a day for me in
> > > India...
> >
> > > > On May 15, 8:53 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Wow ! Discrediting anything that you do not understand is a typical
> > > > > agnostic position. Your comment, Slip Disc, is quite in line with
> that
> > > > > position.
> >
> > > > > On May 16, 4:58 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:> You are
> presenting layers upon layers upon layers of thread topic
> > > > > > here; kinda like sporadic inputs generated by a frenetic thought
> > > > > > process.
> >
> > > > > > Break it down and address a single aspect of the rant so we can
> > > > > > respond specifically to a individual point.
> >
> > > > > > I would have to suggest that you start with your personal
> > > > > > understanding of what "Truth" is.
> >
> > > > > There is nothing personal about "TRUTH". That's what the term
> > > > > "Absolute Truth" means. It is ABSOLUTE in every respect....>You
> obviously are already biased in  the sense of what truth is and further
> anchor your understanding in
> > > > > > theistic principles which don't hold much water other than that
> of a
> > > > > > fanaticism towards another fantasy belief system out of the
> hundreds
> > > > > > of deity fantasies out there.
> >
> > > > > What is the basis for your assumption that my understanding about
> > > > > TRUTH is anchored in theistic principles ? Are you sure that you
> are
> > > > > not mixing-up theistic principles with the procedures of some
> > > > > organised religions like western theistic religions (such as
> > > > > Cristianity, Judaism or Islam) ?
> >
> > > > > > Why don't you try getting with reality?
> >
> > > > > > On May 15, 12:06 pm, Fiercely Free <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >      This is with reference to Hollywood film "Adventures of
> Priscila,
> > > > > > > Queen of Desert".
> > > > > > >      While explaining the system around us, Hegel used the
> terms "Real
> > > > > > > Reality" & "Apparent Reality". By analyzing Hegel's opinion
> that
> > > > > > > history develops as per the logical plan, we can say, "Hegel
> had
> > > > > > > mistaken apparent reality for real reality". What he called as
> real
> > > > > > > reality was actually the determinists' zone. Though he claimed
> to have
> > > > > > > traversed the entire field, it is quite clear that Hegel could
> not see
> > > > > > > the endpoint of the desert shown in the abovementioned
> Hollywood
> > > > > > > film.
> > > > > > >      "The new world order" system (a combination of Snob
> society &
> > > > > > > Republic society) which is in place for the last 44 years, is
> > > > > > > precisely the same nonscientific racist nonsense which was
> overthrown
> > > > > > > by Europe during Age of Reason. (Here, the term racism means a
> nexus
> > > > > > > between forward racism upper cocks & reverse racism
> uppercocks.)
> > > > > > > Racists' urge to project themselves as limit of manliness,
> prompts
> > > > > > > them to label Queens of desert as eunuchs. Just look at the
> list of
> > > > > > > eunuchs prepared by these racist morons & you will be proud to
> be
> > > > > > > Queen of desrt -- Mozes, Hegel, Hitler, Alexander, Hanuman (a
> monkey
> > > > > > > headed God from Hindu mythology)... almost anyone who doesn't
> want to
> > > > > > > deviate from TRUTH gets labeld as eunuch by these mediocre
> racists.
> > > > > > > Apart from cowardice & inefficiency, there is nothing in the
> genes of
> > > > > > > these racists. These are the stupid talkative extroverts who
> were
> > > > > > > running hither & thither when Hitler's battletanks were chasing
> them.
> > > > > > > These are the great soldiers who ditched Alexander for gaining
> favours
> > > > > > > from Dariyas.
> >
> > > > > > > Fromhttp://samirsp.blogspot.com-Hidequotedtext-
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>

Reply via email to