On 3 June, 11:42, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed Gabs, two very differant questions. > > How would you answer? >
I see "What's the point to life?" as, potentially, an objective question, whereas I see "What's the point to living?" as a very subjective question. Of course, you couldn't ask either question to a rock. A depressed priest may have a positive answer for the former question, yet a negative response to the latter question, for example. > On 2 June, 18:32, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Gotta be precise, Molly! > > The rhetorical question that this stage cowboy is posing is: What's > > the point TO life! Any answer to this is covered by the freedom of > > speech act, OK. Whereas the question "What's the point in living" is > > the really interesting one. Do you see the difference and is there a > > reason why you shortened the title in such a prepositionless way? > > > On 2 Jun., 13:30, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q95kX_EP2Nk-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
