" How you answer the question, whats the point? is entirely up to
you."

This I believe is a fair comment or position, in its inclusiveness. We
of course are required to leave this base in practice, when we must
say this TV is better than others, this desire is better than others,
this thought or idea is better than others, this behaviour is better
than others, this occupation is better than the other ... and so on.

That digression from base is purposeful, for we believe in one or
other option or alternate for the time being because it seems to be
your preference then or to be working for you. That would be your
world, your universe that preoccupies you then, and hence represents
your values then.

Sadly, however preferred and believed in, that world or universe is
just mine. I could sound it to others, perhaps form a group of like
believers. But that does not make it universal. Only the base truths
are. If, through the experiences we have, we discover some base
truths, we can definitely put it across to others in an attempt to
layout why it is an universal one, and let the people verify it for
themselves.

Scientists discover base truths pertaining to the material world, the
material parts of the living world. There are base truths pertaining
to the world of life - force, psychological or the mental world,
intellectual and spiritual worlds ...  That shouldn't really be
surprising !



On Jun 9, 5:50 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that whoever posted the Bill Hicks clip gave it the title What
> is the Point to Life, because this is not mentioned in the video
> itself.  Bill simply askes What's the Point?  The then goes on to
> cover the objective and subjective aspects of the question (letting
> the demons run amuck, the objective; choosing to see with eyes of
> love, subjective.)  How you answer the question, whats the point? is
> entirely up to you.
>
> On Jun 7, 12:38 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > do you mean the whole 'life' experience of earth... wats the point in
> > that..?
>
> > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:23 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Na, Pat. I was after the preposition, really, that didn't make it over
> > > to this site. I saw the point in omitting the apostrophe and wanted to
> > > know whether the prepositional non-pointedness was of equal concern to
> > > Molly. I can live with the answer.
>
> > > As for the point to life - this is the meaning that each and every
> > > individual can assign to what he/she/it understands life is. Therefore
> > > a highly subjective approach. Whereas the point IN living question is
> > > the potentially objective approach that includes rocks also.
>
> > > Never mind.
>
> > > On 4 Jun., 14:18, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On 3 June, 11:42, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > Indeed Gabs, two very differant questions.
>
> > > > > How would you answer?
>
> > > > I see "What's the point to life?" as, potentially, an objective
> > > > question, whereas I see "What's the point to living?" as a very
> > > > subjective question.  Of course, you couldn't ask either question to a
> > > > rock.  A depressed priest may have a positive answer for the former
> > > > question, yet a negative response to the latter question, for example.
>
> > > > > On 2 June, 18:32, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Gotta be precise, Molly!
> > > > > > The rhetorical question that this stage cowboy is posing is: What's
> > > > > > the point TO life! Any answer to this is covered by the freedom of
> > > > > > speech act, OK. Whereas the question "What's the point in living" is
> > > > > > the really interesting one. Do you see the difference and is there a
> > > > > > reason why you shortened the title in such a prepositionless way?
>
> > > > > > On 2 Jun., 13:30, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q95kX_EP2Nk-Hidequotedtext-
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to