Interesting comparison! You may have sparked a muse in me, I must ponder this a bit... though I think it has already been done to the effect of; "hey all you sinners... turn your lights on... turn your lights on"
On Jun 7, 10:15 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > If only it wasn't so depressing I would find it absurd: the amount of > money people of a certain nationality pay for the kilowatt hour in > contrast to the amount of money they pay for purely spiritual > enlightening sessions. > > On 7 Jun., 06:38, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > do you mean the whole 'life' experience of earth... wats the point in > > that..? > > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:23 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Na, Pat. I was after the preposition, really, that didn't make it over > > > to this site. I saw the point in omitting the apostrophe and wanted to > > > know whether the prepositional non-pointedness was of equal concern to > > > Molly. I can live with the answer. > > > > As for the point to life - this is the meaning that each and every > > > individual can assign to what he/she/it understands life is. Therefore > > > a highly subjective approach. Whereas the point IN living question is > > > the potentially objective approach that includes rocks also. > > > > Never mind. > > > > On 4 Jun., 14:18, Pat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 3 June, 11:42, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Indeed Gabs, two very differant questions. > > > > > > How would you answer? > > > > > I see "What's the point to life?" as, potentially, an objective > > > > question, whereas I see "What's the point to living?" as a very > > > > subjective question. Of course, you couldn't ask either question to a > > > > rock. A depressed priest may have a positive answer for the former > > > > question, yet a negative response to the latter question, for example. > > > > > > On 2 June, 18:32, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Gotta be precise, Molly! > > > > > > The rhetorical question that this stage cowboy is posing is: What's > > > > > > the point TO life! Any answer to this is covered by the freedom of > > > > > > speech act, OK. Whereas the question "What's the point in living" is > > > > > > the really interesting one. Do you see the difference and is there a > > > > > > reason why you shortened the title in such a prepositionless way? > > > > > > > On 2 Jun., 13:30, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q95kX_EP2Nk-Hidequotedtext- > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -- > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
