Lee ..all i am saying is it is possible for such a relationship to exist..rarely...and i know wat you say is true of most cases..
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:24 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Yes indeed it certianly is, any parent will tell you so. However > favour of the one above another is just a fact. > > I have two children, and although it is a thing that parents should > never let on to their kids of course I favour one over the other. > Haha not in the way you may think however. > > My boys are 17 and 14. The 17 year old I favour for decent > conversation, the 14 year old I favour for having a laugh with. > > > But sexualy intimatsy always, and I mean always in every occasion (of > the 'right mind' ) carries with it a huge emotianal content. > > Jelosy is a strange beast indeed, and one can never predict when it > will hit. You may find that anger is a far far easyier emotion to > keep a modicum of control over than jelousy ever is. > > On 22 June, 15:02, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well..what i also meant is that it is possible to be intimate emotionally > > with more than one person..without favoring one over the other... and i > dont > > understand why some people dont believe that.. or have a problem with > that > > idea... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "I think open relationships are much better..there is no emotional > > > burden" psk > > > > > This assumption may come back to bite you. I would refer you to the > > > biographies of Sartre/DeBeauvior and O'Keefe/Steigliz. The extensive > > > published material about these two open relationships should show you > > > how heavy multiple relationships can be. > > > > > Relationships are our contemporary temples. We learn more about > > > ourselves through our most intimate relationships than anywhere else > > > possible, if we are open to the awareness. There is endless beauty in > > > the devoution of two people to eachother. However, it seems not > > > everyone is capable of such intimacy or self discovery for myriad > > > reasons. What is right for you may change over time, it may not. To > > > each his own. > > > > > On Jun 21, 4:26 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have a hard time believing when someone tells me that they have > > > > found the one... what does it mean anyway..The one.. why does it > thave > > > > to be one...I believe that people can and do fall in love with more > > > > than one person at the same time...and that is why i am opposed to > > > > marriage as an institution...a promise to be with each other > > > > forever!...I think open relationships are much better..there is no > > > > emotional burden...Also sexual and emotional intimacy does not always > > > > have to be in one single package.. i do not see adultery as something > > > > horrible...and i really resented the way media made an example of > > > > Tiger woods and his many affairs...so wat he slept with many women.. > > > > its not like they didnt know who he was and that he was married...The > > > > fact that religion penetrated and dictated every aspect of individual > > > > lives still shows its effects...sex is something sacred and at the > > > > same time tabboed(although some countries have come to take liberal > > > > views there are still many orthodox societies)... its a natural > > > > instinct why make something else out of it...its like hunger..The > more > > > > you try to regulate it the more you pervert it...the fact that > > > > teenagers are told to abstain should only be because of health > reasons > > > > not because premarital sex is a sin...It was because that religion > > > > first dictated that homosexuality is immoral that subsequent legal > > > > bans on it followed.. and it is still so ingrained in society that > > > > most homosexuals have a hard life..only because of one aspect of > their > > > > individuality... As for monogamy i really dont think it is a > universal > > > > truth...i mean it was fine when the mortality rate was around 50 you > > > > could stick around with one.. but things are changing... And with the > > > > society must evolve its institutions and the values related to these > > > > institutions ... So after all this rambling all id like to say is > that > > > > the society should rethink its basic elements which it takes for > > > > granted ...i dont mean to offend all you happily married people out > > > > there.. just a private opinion.. and I'd like to know wat you all > > > > think.. > > > > -- > > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > -- \--/ Peace
