I failed to see any ridicule in the post you linked to RP. Molly had a very valid point as well. It IS a matter of consciousness but sad truth is our conscioness is grossly undeveloped. We are coming to a point in time that we shall overcome the chasims that have impeaded our mind's potential and that is what I was alluding to in the Cause and Effect discussion. Our intent on evolving into a higher collective consciosness must be both on the individual level and the collective level but ultimately we shall evolve.
On Jul 3, 9:54 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not discount the possibility of parallel universes RP as they are > allowed in theory. The laws of physics are not laws they are theories. > Occam's Razor is a good tool for developing theoretical models but > this should not be considered an irrefutable principal of logic. There > are some things that cannot be accounted for in physics with all the > theories out there and Occam's Razor does not apply. > > On Jul 3, 8:15 am, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Mar > > 12, 2008 > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each layer > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end as the > > past is > > ...http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8... > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing a lot > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my belief I > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
