On 4 July, 17:59, ashok tewari <[email protected]> wrote: > Whose need are talking about ? Pat's ? God's ? That's why I suggest : let > speculation be just that ; do not take it to be the truth. As OM would say > : Don't believe all that you think ! >
If you put that "Don't believe all that you think" into action yourself, then you must refute that very notion. Where does THAT land you? If you don't believe what you think, why should anyone else believe what you think? The 'need' was, of course, that of 'The One', who HAS all of time, and, therefore, gains nothing by virtue of running universes in parallel. The only thing we gain by doing things 'in parallel' is time and, when you have all of time (as 'The One' does), nothing is gained. Therefore, I stick by my thought and say that parallel universes, while possible, aren't likely as nothing is gained by their employment. > > > > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pat really is the resident expert here so for a full understanding you > > might consider waiting for his return. I believe his thought is that > > there is no need for parallel universes, when serial universes (one > > change is enough, no need to re create the entire universe for it) are > > more efficient. The whole Occam Razors bit. I am sure he would give > > you an honest run for your money if he was available to do so. > > > On Jul 3, 8:15 am, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Mar > > > 12, 2008 > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each layer > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end as the > > > past is ... > >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8... > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing a lot > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my belief I > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence? > > -- > ASHOK TEWARI- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
