Isn't the description of parallel universe(s) a concept like the collective unconscious. And even though people such as Jung are totally convinced that the collective unconscious exists independent of human minds - his assertion is an unproven hypothesis and not an absolute fact?
-----Original Message----- From: RP Singh <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, Jul 7, 2010 10:17 am Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes Parallel universes have nothing to do with human consciousness. Just as a moon is different from Earth, parallel universes are different from this universe and are not touched by anything in this universe and exist as the name suggests in a completely parallel space which cannot be reached from this space as it is not in continuance of this space. Vam would say keep your imaginings to yourself , but it is all a game of imaginings and to me all this talk of self-realisation is just imaginings and just bacause few people have been saying approximately the same thing over time does not make it true. To me God, Truth, Atma alone is truth as it will always be there, not in a physical and psychological sense but in a spiritual sense, and everything else including you and me will perish and be no more in a permanent sense. On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:36 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: Psychologically I think it more plausible to consider "parallel universes" as a by product of our individual and collective creative imagination to conceptualize alternative pathways in our consciousness. All is possible in the creative consciousness. But in terms of actuality we are always limited by our individual and collective choices of the moment. -----Original Message----- From: pol.science kid <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, Jul 5, 2010 11:15 am Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes but wat about the future...wouldnt that be a parallel universe for the traveller too... On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:32 PM, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: Theory allows for time travel forward into the future but current theory does not support the possibility to travel back in time but through our own memories. If it were possible to travel back in time then parallel universes must come into play as our history would begin to diverge once we hit a point in the past. Since the time traveler would continue to have memories of his history from another point in the future theoretically he would exist in parralel with his own existence. On Jul 4, 11:35 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > ok.. i have a question..is time travel science fiction to.. or is it > hypothetically possible too... > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 5:45 PM, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Mar > > 12, 2008 > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each layer > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end as the > > past is ... > >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8... > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing a lot > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my belief I > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence? > > -- > \--/ Peace -- \--/ Peace
