What exactly do you mean by 'absolute' fact? There is much empirical data to suggest that collective conciuoness and the collective unconscioness are real and much the same. Here's a link I keep handy to some research into collective consciouness. http://www.collectivewisdominitiative.org/papers/kenny_science.htm
On Jul 7, 10:40 am, [email protected] wrote: > Isn't the description of parallel universe(s) a concept like the collective > unconscious. And even though people such as Jung are totally convinced that > the collective unconscious exists independent of human minds - his assertion > is an unproven hypothesis and not an absolute fact? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: RP Singh <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wed, Jul 7, 2010 10:17 am > Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes > > Parallel universes have nothing to do with human consciousness. Just as a > moon is different from Earth, parallel universes are different from this > universe and are not touched by anything in this universe and exist as the > name suggests in a completely parallel space which cannot be reached from > this space as it is not in continuance of this space. > Vam would say keep your imaginings to yourself , but it is all a game of > imaginings and to me all this talk of self-realisation is just imaginings and > just bacause few people have been saying approximately the same thing over > time does not make it true. To me God, Truth, Atma alone is truth as it will > always be there, not in a physical and psychological sense but in a spiritual > sense, and everything else including you and me will perish and be no more > in a permanent sense. > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:36 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Psychologically I think it more plausible to consider "parallel universes" as > a by product of our > > individual and collective creative imagination to conceptualize alternative > pathways in our consciousness. > > All is possible in the creative consciousness. But in terms of actuality we > are always limited by our individual > > and collective choices of the moment. > > -----Original Message----- > From: pol.science kid <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Mon, Jul 5, 2010 11:15 am > Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes > > but wat about the future...wouldnt that be a parallel universe for the > traveller too... > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:32 PM, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Theory allows for time travel forward into the future but current > theory does not support the possibility to travel back in time but > through our own memories. If it were possible to travel back in time > then parallel universes must come into play as our history would > begin to diverge once we hit a point in the past. Since the time > traveler would continue to have memories of his history from another > point in the future theoretically he would exist in parralel with his > own existence. > > On Jul 4, 11:35 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > ok.. i have a question..is time travel science fiction to.. or is it > > hypothetically possible too... > > > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 5:45 PM, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Mar > > > 12, 2008 > > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each layer > > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end as the > > > past is ... > > > >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8... > > > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing a lot > > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my belief I > > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence? > > > -- > > \--/ Peace > > -- > \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
