On Jul 7, 7:17 pm, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Parallel universes have nothing to do with human consciousness. Just as a > moon is different from Earth, parallel universes are different from this > universe and are not touched by anything in this universe and exist as the > name suggests in a completely parallel space which cannot be reached from > this space as it is not in continuance of this space.
> Vam would say keep your imaginings to yourself , but it is all a game of > imaginings ... Yeah, isn't it ! ? > ... and to me all this talk of self-realisation is just imaginings ... How do you know ? Are you self - realised ? What do YOU understand of self - realisation ? > ... and just bacause few people have been saying approximately the same thing > over time does not make it true. Are saying more people saying approximately the same thing would make it true ? What would make a thing true ? Would your saying it make it true ? > ... To me God, Truth, Atma alone is truth ... How do you know that ? > ... as it will always be there ... How do you know ? What exactly are you talking about ? > ... not in a physical and psychological sense but in a > spiritual sense, and everything else including you and me will perish and > be no more in a permanent sense. > > > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:36 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Psychologically I think it more plausible to consider "parallel universes" > > as a by product of our > > > individual and collective creative imagination to conceptualize alternative > > pathways in our consciousness. > > > All is possible in the creative consciousness. But in terms of actuality we > > are always limited by our individual > > > and collective choices of the moment. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pol.science kid <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Mon, Jul 5, 2010 11:15 am > > Subject: Re: [Mind's Eye] Re: Parallel Universes > > > but wat about the future...wouldnt that be a parallel universe for the > > traveller too... > > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:32 PM, DarkwaterBlight > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> Theory allows for time travel forward into the future but current > >> theory does not support the possibility to travel back in time but > >> through our own memories. If it were possible to travel back in time > >> then parallel universes must come into play as our history would > >> begin to diverge once we hit a point in the past. Since the time > >> traveler would continue to have memories of his history from another > >> point in the future theoretically he would exist in parralel with his > >> own existence. > > >> On Jul 4, 11:35 pm, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > ok.. i have a question..is time travel science fiction to.. or is it > >> > hypothetically possible too... > > >> > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 5:45 PM, RP <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Parallel spaceMinds-Eye - 2 posts - 2 authors - Last post: Mar > >> > > 12, 2008 > >> > > rp singh ... Minds-Eye Space has infinite layers and in each layer > >> > > there is a unique universe. Time has no beginning and no end as the > >> > > past is ... > >> > >http://groups.google.com/g/3517fe0c/t/fca83d2320a90343/d/df18f534e5c8. > >> .. > > >> > > I wrote about parallel universes in ME as above. I am hearing a lot > >> > > about parallel universes nowadays whereas when I expounded my belief I > >> > > was ridiculed. Is it just co-incidence? > > >> > -- > >> > \--/ Peace > > > -- > > \--/ Peace
