On Sep 13, 7:25 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > You actually believe all those stories?
Of course I believe John Chapter 6. And of course you do not! And so we necessarily have /different/ ideas of the nature of man and consequently what is good for man. One who believes man is made in the image by God, laid low by sin, in need of a Savor, will take one view on what is good for man. One who believes man is a swam of particles has quite a different view of the good. > It is a book alan, paper and pen, stories, allegory and metaphor. > > Quoting scripture is merely quoting a storyline. The bible is full to > the brim with contradiction and conflict. The old testament is full > of atrocity and vengeance, bloodshed, rape and murder by the command, > jurisdiction or under the auspices of the loving god. Then there were > 400 years without a word, the Romans were brutal and so was needed a > savior, and so one was born but who would believe it if it were born > like everyone else so only a virgin birth would do. And so the god > father in a demonstration of his love for humanity has his 'only' son > brutally tortured and killed. Wow, oh I forgot, that was because of > our sins, the sins we were born with. And now people have to give up > 10% of their earnings to the people who keep these stories alive or > else fire and brimstone. Great story! > > On Sep 13, 4:55 pm, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > "By what means did the christian faith corner the market on knowing > > what > > is good for man?". By Christ the Lord, who said some pretty startling > > things on the topic, such as "I am the way and the truth and the life. > > No one comes to the Father except through me." (John 8:6). > > > And of course in John Chapter 6 v. 48, we learn from the Inventor of > > food about Real Food: > > > "I am the bread of life. Your ancestors ate the manna in the desert, > > but they died;this is the bread that comes down from heaven so that > > one may eat it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from > > heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that > > I will give is my flesh for the life of the world." > > > The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, "How can this man give us > > (his) flesh to eat?" Jesus said to them, "Amen, amen, I say to you, > > unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do > > not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood > > has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day." > > > On Sep 13, 1:21 pm, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > As much as I can agree with much of what you say, and am a non- > > > christian believer in Christ... I am having a hard time digesting the > > > 'meat' of you statement which is contained in the last sentance. By > > > what means did the christian faith corner the market on knowing what > > > is good for man? You must be reffering to the 'Pauline' brand of > > > modern soothesayers that claim to follow Christ. The likes of wich > > > would say to the starving man; "God bless you in the name of Jesus, > > > I'll pray for you!" and not help the man's hunger or his condition. > > > > On Sep 13, 1:39 pm, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, you "can have a feeling of responsibility towards society and > > > > consider it your duty towards it and do what is good for you and the > > > > others". But what have feelings to do with doing good? > > > > > A man comes upon a starving man, knowing little about human nature, > > > > offers him a good thick steak and a glass of wine. But the starving > > > > man cannot digest the food. The first man had a sincere "feeling of > > > > responsibility", and really wanted to "do what is good for the other", > > > > but utterly botched it, because he is ignorant of what is really good > > > > for the other man. > > > > > No doubt those with a "humanitarian mindset" mean well, and act in > > > > accord with what they believe is good for fellow humans, just like the > > > > Jihadist, or the mercy killer who euthanizes the sick patient, or the > > > > abortionist, or Hitler. Everybody does what he /believes/ to be good > > > > for his fellow man. But only those who /know/ what is good for their > > > > neighbor can consistently deliver. > > > > > On the Christian view, if we do not know Christ, we do not know what > > > > man is, so it is quite impossible to do good for man, except by > > > > accident. > > > > > On Sep 13, 10:30 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > A person can have a humanitarian mindset regardless of religion. You > > > > > don't > > > > > have to believe in God to be good , you can have a feeling of > > > > > responsibility > > > > > towards society and consider it your duty towards it and do what is > > > > > good > > > > > for you and the others. Patriots need not be religious , yet they > > > > > feel a > > > > > great responsibility towards their country. There are so many motives > > > > > for a > > > > > man to do good to others irrespective of religion. On the other hand > > > > > people > > > > > are known to indulge in vice and ask God's forgiveness later. > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Alan Wostenberg <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Sure, "helping is primal". But the Jihadist, having a different > > > > > > theology than the Christian, believes he is helping you by > > > > > > converting > > > > > > you to Islam by the sword. Not so the Christian, for whom religion > > > > > > is > > > > > > the "The voluntary subjection of oneself to God". > > > > > > > The island of atheists? Sure, they'd "help others" for some > > > > > > definition > > > > > > of "help" and "others". I know something about the Christian command > > > > > > to love my neighbor but don't know the official atheist dogma on > > > > > > helping others. If one acted like there were no God why would he > > > > > > think he has any duty to help others? > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 8:28 am, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > AW; > > > > > > > Yes there is............. > > > > > > > I'll refer you to rigsy's sept. 6 10:15 am post as to my > > > > > > > "theistic > > > > > > > religiosity" comment. > > > > > > > > Also, people use therapy and AA like a religion- in fact, they > > > > > > > "use" a > > > > > > > lot of things in lieu of religion. What about jingoism? <<<rigsy > > > > > > > > Do you think no one would help anyone else on an island of > > > > > > > atheists > > > > > > > because they didn't have a religion to tell them to do so? > > > > > > > Helping > > > > > > > is primal and innate as nurturing; religion and faith is human > > > > > > > construct and not necessity.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -
