Ash, thanks for taking the time to read some of my religious writings
and commenting on them, I know that there is a lot to read there, so,
take your time and come back whenever you like, but I want to tell you
this; the most important part is still to come and it will be written
in, Prayers of Reconciliation in the chapter called Reconciliation of
the Universe, I hope one day you read that also.

RP Singh, I have read your thoughts and I find them very interesting
and they seem to run in a parallel way with my own beliefs, so I agree
with you there; I will come back to read them again one day just to
see if you have added anything else. Manfraco

On Jan 21, 3:31 pm, Ash <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/20/2011 7:43 PM, Manfraco Frank Elder wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi everybody!
> > So, you are back to talk about my favourite subject, the existence or
> > non existence of God. Because this religious subject interests me, I
> > hope you don't mind my popping in.
> > RP. Singh, your descreption of God and individual life is very close
> > to the way I believe it is, well said. I hope that this thread go on
> > for a while, it might be interesting to see what we may learn from
> > it.
> > Lee, when you say that, God is said to be many things by many people
> > you are right and we all see God in a different ways I agree with you
> > there.
> > Anyhow I have my own beliefs about God, so, I am writing my own theory
> > about God and religions, my theory at this stage is only half written,
> > I will have a complete sketch of it in a few months, however if you
> > would like to find out what I am writing click on the link hereunder,
> > and follow the links that you find in my site.
> >https://sites.google.com/site/prayersofreconciliation/
> > Hoping that my link works for you,
> > Let me know what you think if you read my religious writings
> > Manfraco
>
> I think your site has some beautiful concepts Fran, inherently. The
> sense of adventure and a journey is quite pleasing in God Needs Man, I'm
> just at p12 and have to put it down for other things but look forward to
> finishing the read.
>
>
>
> > On Jan 20, 8:45 pm, "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >> Heh yes of course.  But God is said to be many things by many people.
> >> Some say there is no God, some say that God is called Allah, some say
> >> that all Gods are but aspects of the one God.
>
> >> What one may belive of God is of course up to the individual.  What
> >> you claim must be true, or so you belive, but I belive otherwise.  Now
> >> how to tell what truth is objective huh!
>
> >> On Jan 19, 7:15 pm, RP Singh<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
> >>> God is said to be nirguna , that is , without attributes. He has no
> >>> shape and hence cannot be seen or  felt ; he has no sound and hence
> >>> cannot be heard , cannot be tasted or smelled. He is beyond awareness
> >>> and thus is non-dual , we beings are dualistic and have sprung from
> >>> that supreme Being who , though non-dualistic , is the source of all.
> >>> His is the state of supreme bliss which is beyond the senses. Whatever
> >>> we know and experience involves the senses and He is beyond the
> >>> senses.
> >>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:05 PM, [email protected]
> >>> <[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>>> I almost agree with you RP.  But of course it is possible to
> >>>> experiance such bliss whilst still alive, not easy, but possible.
> >>>> On Jan 19, 2:49 pm, RP Singh<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>>>> All are different , some are incompetent , some competent; some are
> >>>>> fools , others are brilliant ; some are esteemed , others despicable;
> >>>>> and so on and on. But in reality all are equal as all are made from
> >>>>> the One , Godself , and to that Godself all eventually go and find
> >>>>> eternal peace , the supreme bliss which can be understood but never
> >>>>> experienced while in this body.- Hide quoted text -
> >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to