I know, and I have since I made this post. I would love to share it with the world. However, it actually makes sense to more people than myself now and I'm afraid of having my idea stolen. I couldn't care less about fame or fortune, but what my theory unveils is too powerful. Now, I don't explain it with an equation and I know it wouldn't be accepted scientifically as is. However, I know that it could be. The question I have now is, how do I protect such information while still presenting it to the world?
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand your need to relativize, Manofranco. Communication fails > otherwise. My working hypothesis is that this is why my absolutist friends > have left this forum here, for instance. > > Clayton, thank you for revitalizing this questionable subject matter! > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Manfraco Frank Elder > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> This is just one way to describe God, which is as if God and >> everything else is one and the same thing, at least this is how I >> understand your post; Is this what you want to say, or not? >> My regards >> Manfraco >> >> On Feb 24, 4:26 am, Clayton <[email protected]> wrote: >> > My theory is that God (I use God for lack of a better word)is the want >> > to exist, the want to exist that lies within everything that does >> > exist and that is why it does. >> > >> > What I am saying is that all matter and energy was created from >> > another force. A force that is not yet understood by science. A force >> > that I describe as God, the want to exist. >> > >> > What the want to exist is theoretically, is the driving force that has >> > created everything that exist’s within our universe, and also that >> > within every particle that has come to exist, there also lies a want >> > to exist, and this driving force has went on to create all the >> > complexity that exists. Everything from the most basic particle on up >> > to things such as ourselves, beings that are aware of the world and in >> > a sense allow for its existence. (Does anything exist if it doesn’t >> > have an observer?) >> > > >
