Same here Rigsy, well I have a laymans understanding.
On Feb 25, 12:15 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > And the string or chaos theories do not seem out of place, either. I > don't fully understand those, as well. > > On Feb 25, 4:08 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Heh Clayton, > > > Im afraid your theroy is at least thousands of years old, and is > > saying the same kinda things that out Hindu brothers and sisters, and > > out Sikh brothers and sisters have always been saying but using > > diffeant words. > > > In fact I'm quite convinced that all religoins say the same, but agian > > using differant words and differant anolgies to express this idea. > > > Even science has it's own version. Perhap King Solomon had it correct > > when he procliamed 'there is nothing new under the sun'. > > > On Feb 24, 12:00 pm, Clayton Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I know, and I have since I made this post. I would love to share it with > > > the > > > world. However, it actually makes sense to more people than myself now > > > and > > > I'm afraid of having my idea stolen. I couldn't care less about fame or > > > fortune, but what my theory unveils is too powerful. Now, I don't explain > > > it > > > with an equation and I know it wouldn't be accepted scientifically as is. > > > However, I know that it could be. The question I have now is, how do I > > > protect such information while still presenting it to the world? > > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I understand your need to relativize, Manofranco. Communication fails > > > > otherwise. My working hypothesis is that this is why my absolutist > > > > friends > > > > have left this forum here, for instance. > > > > > Clayton, thank you for revitalizing this questionable subject matter! > > > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Manfraco Frank Elder > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> This is just one way to describe God, which is as if God and > > > >> everything else is one and the same thing, at least this is how I > > > >> understand your post; Is this what you want to say, or not? > > > >> My regards > > > >> Manfraco > > > > >> On Feb 24, 4:26 am, Clayton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > My theory is that God (I use God for lack of a better word)is the > > > >> > want > > > >> > to exist, the want to exist that lies within everything that does > > > >> > exist and that is why it does. > > > > >> > What I am saying is that all matter and energy was created from > > > >> > another force. A force that is not yet understood by science. A force > > > >> > that I describe as God, the want to exist. > > > > >> > What the want to exist is theoretically, is the driving force that > > > >> > has > > > >> > created everything that exist’s within our universe, and also that > > > >> > within every particle that has come to exist, there also lies a want > > > >> > to exist, and this driving force has went on to create all the > > > >> > complexity that exists. Everything from the most basic particle on up > > > >> > to things such as ourselves, beings that are aware of the world and > > > >> > in > > > >> > a sense allow for its existence. (Does anything exist if it doesn’t > > > >> > have an observer?)- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
