Sorry Clayton, I just missed to give you my links, which are hereunder
https://sites.google.com/site/prayersofreconciliation/
http://manfracoreconciliations.blogspot.com/
Manfraco

On Feb 26, 7:27 am, Manfraco Frank Elder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Clayton! Or Clayton Taylor whichever you are, you see for me it is
> a bit confusing and I tend to believe that you maybe just one person
> logging in with both names.
> Anyhow that does not matter, but, I would like to know why are you
> afraid of having your idea stolen? Today lots of people have their own
> ideas of what God could be like, you see, I have got my own idea and I
> am putting it forward by leaving my links on the Internet, so that
> people know what my ideas are, otherwise my ideas will never be known?
> You see, there is no much to be gained or earned from theories unless
> they become so popular and millions of people follow you. So, we all
> would like to see your theory, if you do not mind sharing it with us?
> By the way this is my link to my partly written religious writings,
>
> On Feb 24, 10:00 pm, Clayton Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I know, and I have since I made this post. I would love to share it with the
> > world. However,  it actually makes sense to more people than myself now and
> > I'm afraid of having my idea stolen. I couldn't care less about fame or
> > fortune, but what my theory unveils is too powerful. Now, I don't explain it
> > with an equation and I know it wouldn't be accepted scientifically as is.
> > However, I know that it could be. The question I have now is, how do I
> > protect such information while still presenting it to the world?
>
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:01 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I understand your need to relativize, Manofranco. Communication fails
> > > otherwise. My working hypothesis is that this is why my absolutist friends
> > > have left this forum here, for instance.
>
> > > Clayton, thank you for revitalizing this questionable subject matter!
>
> > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Manfraco Frank Elder 
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> > >> This is just one way to describe God, which is as if God and
> > >> everything else is one and the same thing, at least this is how I
> > >> understand your post; Is this what you want to say, or not?
> > >> My regards
> > >> Manfraco
>
> > >> On Feb 24, 4:26 am, Clayton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > My theory is that God (I use God for lack of a better word)is the want
> > >> > to exist, the want to exist that lies within everything that does
> > >> > exist and that is why it does.
>
> > >> > What I am saying is that all matter and energy was created from
> > >> > another force. A force that is not yet understood by science. A force
> > >> > that I describe as God, the want to exist.
>
> > >> > What the want to exist is theoretically, is the driving force that has
> > >> > created everything that exist’s within our universe, and also that
> > >> > within every particle that has come to exist, there also lies a want
> > >> > to exist, and this driving force has went on to create all the
> > >> > complexity that exists. Everything from the most basic particle on up
> > >> > to things such as ourselves, beings that are aware of the world and in
> > >> > a sense allow for its existence. (Does anything exist if it doesn’t
> > >> > have an observer?)- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to