So is morality/religion a means/tool of adaptation?

On Feb 26, 9:17 pm, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> It depends upon man's nature and the opportunities in his environment
> that result in successive environments.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:36 AM, kenny <[email protected]> wrote:
> > "and how shall man hope to see himself as nature made him, across all
> > the changes which the succession of place and time must have produced
> > in his original composition". rousseau
>
> > On Feb 25, 9:32 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> We have choice but it is limited by our motivational forces. We go to
> >> a restaurant and order food by choice but according to our taste buds
> >> or health habits. Our freedom is bound by many factors , some of which
> >> we are not even aware of. The choice is ours and the responsibility is
> >> ours but the motivating force behind the curtain is determined by our
> >> nature. On being confronted by a bully the meek among us act with
> >> timidity but the bold among us act with aggression. Our nature is
> >> determined to a large extent by factors beyond our control , we are
> >> not responsible for our genes or the environment in which we were born
> >> and yet they are responsible for our nature. The desire to change
> >> ourselves , to improve ourselves comes from within us and is innate in
> >> us , what we see as our freedom has causative factors of which we are
> >> not aware.
>
> >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 7:21 PM, pol.science kid <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > I was thinking...it is our ability to make a choice that makes us
> >> > moral beings....but is it necessary that animals dont make a
> >> > choice...and do we really make an active choice....and i would like
> >> > someone to talk about responsibility in the same sense...- Hide quoted 
> >> > text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to