Oh, I see what you're saying now and I agree completely. Spreading radiation around is not a good thing. It is very hard to control the amount of collateral damage from a nuclear blast. And, depending on the type of blast, the effect of a single explosion can be felt worldwide.
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:07 AM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]>wrote: > “…Can you tell me what is being radiated, …” – CB > > People [“humanity”] …as well as everything else in close proximity > that receives doses of radiation. Of course, I was commenting on my > agreement with *your* words about ‘nukes’. > > “…how it's being radiated and exactly who is doing the radiating? “ – > CB > > Again, your words mentioned soldiers, leaders, nukes…right? > > > On Apr 15, 9:46 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Nope. Still no help. Radiation is the emanation of particles of matter or > > energy. That implies that something is being radiated. > > > > Can you tell me what is being radiated, how it's being radiated and > exactly > > who is doing the radiating? > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:19 PM, ornamentalmind < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > Chuck...perhaps using the term radiation would help? People worldwide > > > have and continue to spread radiation in ways that are harmful to > > > humanity. > > > > > On Apr 15, 7:51 am, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:18 AM, ornamentalmind > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Chuck, what you are now saying about soldiers and leaders and nukes > I > > > > > agree with entirely; > > > > > however, I don’t differentiate that much between > > > > > ‘sides’ when it comes to willingness to radiate humanity. This is > born > > > > > out at least by history. > > > > > > Sorry, but I'm not sure I know what this means. When you say 'radiate > > > > humanity' are you referring to the physical act of creating more > people > > > the > > > > act of disseminating cultural values, or something else? >
