Where does that leave the prescriptive moral which I find is really under discussion here?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Chuck Bowling < [email protected]> wrote: > The term “morality” can be used either > > 1. descriptively to refer to some codes of conduct put forward by a > society or, > 1. some other group, such as a religion, or > 2. accepted by an individual for her own behavior or > 2. normatively to refer to a code of conduct that, given specified > conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons. > > The above definition of morality was taken from the Standford Encyclopedia > of Philosophy. > > It seems to me that while the interpretation of the individual may be > subjective, the overall goal of a code of conduct is to objectify behavioral > expectations within the group or society. > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:14 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> In short then a flawed human is flawed only on measures of subjective >> morality. I contend that there exists no such thing as objective >> morality. >> >> >
