I think most of us are in the same boat where time is a consideration. I do most of my posting from work also but do, at times, post from home. It takes a bit of dedication to moderate and though I would not refuse the spot, I don't know that I would be the best for it. I have a tendancy to let emails pile up and often just do a mass deletion of my inbox. Currently I don't recieve emails from groups and I rarely reply by email. I'm only vaguely familiar with the group guidlines and don't take very much too seriously unless it costs or makes me money.
On Apr 28, 6:46 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hahaha sorry Doug, I have already refused the post once, like Fran I'm > simply too busy. Have you not noticed how you never hear anything > from me if I'm not at work? > > On Apr 27, 6:57 pm, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > OK I'm changing my vote... I vote for Lee and keep the virgins. > > > On Apr 27, 7:14 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > A little bit of a hijack here but nevermind. > > > > If a man is happy with his life and with all aspects of his self, then > > > he sees no fault in himself. How would he then react to being > > > 'helped' by those who see fault in him? > > > > If you are largly locked into viewing the world as you view it then > > > what you are talking about is subjective morality. > > > > You see a fault in another human, and proclaim it as such due to your > > > moral stance. There is no objectivity in this, if you are striving > > > for an objective faultless life, then sorry my freind you will not > > > find it. > > > > Let us take an example. Let it be personal to me. > > > > I abhour bigotry, of any kind, be that bias on grounds of gender, skin > > > colour, age, sexuality, intelect or what have you. > > > > So according to my morality a racist is a piece of shit, and personaly > > > I'll have nowt to do with any of them. However would I say that a > > > racist is a faulted person? Nope, they have ultimate freedom over > > > their own life, and their own desicions, I don't like it, I wont like > > > them, but I see no fault. > > > > Bottom line is a liberal application of the 'Golden Rule'. I like it > > > that I get to life my own life as I will, I must therefore apply > > > exactly the same standard to each and every other human, or face being > > > a hypocrit. The human condition is a strange one, now if you belive > > > in a creative diety then you must belive that you are exaclty how God > > > intend you to be, hence no fault. If you do not belive in such then > > > you must belive that you have evolved into who you are and as such > > > there is no objective standard by which to measure you agianst others. > > > > In short then a flawed human is flawed only on measures of subjective > > > morality. I contend that there exists no such thing as objective > > > morality. > > > > On Apr 27, 5:55 am, the taoist shaman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > i may be new and young , but it seems to me that if u see falt in > > > > anonther u should try to help that person see themselves more > > > > clearly , or that person is aware and happy w/ who they are , and > > > > therefore the fault lies in u for judgment and lack of acceptance , if > > > > there is a solid sound minded simple non conveluted re butt el in > > > > argument of this statment i would be very intrested to hear it > > > > > Ash wrote: > > > > > Sorry, that would require more than three, if I had to cast a vote > > > > > please > > > > > add mine as the best pick by and/or between the moderators. By the > > > > > way, who > > > > > are the moderators? O.o- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
