I agree that any interpretation of a moral code of conduct is subjective.
However, it still provides a framework of commonality on which to build a
consensus of understanding.

For instance, the idea of not killing someone without a very good reason
lays the groundwork for determining if an action adhered to a set of moral
standards. If you knock over a liquor store and kill the owner because "da
fool wouldn't gi me da money" you may have fulfilled your own personal
criteria of having a very good reason but I'd tend to think twelve other
people sitting on a jury would disagree - unless your name is OJ Simpson.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:45 AM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes I think this is true Chuck, however due to the nature of personal
> subjective morality has it any hope of happening?
>
> Think of only the Christian faith and see how it has spintered under
> differances over dogma.
>
> Even like minded individuals will not share exactly the smae moral
> code.  Nope there is no objective morality and I don't think there
> every will be.
>
> On Apr 27, 8:22 pm, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > The term “morality” can be used either
> >
> >    1. descriptively to refer to some codes of conduct put forward by a
> >    society or,
> >       1. some other group, such as a religion, or
> >       2. accepted by an individual for her own behavior or
> >    2. normatively to refer to a code of conduct that, given specified
> >    conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons.
> >
> > The above definition of morality was taken from the Standford
> Encyclopedia
> > of Philosophy.
> >
> > It seems to me that while the interpretation of the individual may be
> > subjective, the overall goal of a code of conduct is to objectify
> behavioral
> > expectations within the group or society.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:14 AM, [email protected] <
> >
> >
> >
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > In short then a flawed human is flawed only on measures of subjective
> > > morality.  I contend that there exists no such thing as objective
> > > morality.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to