Would you shed a little light on " collective mind ".
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote: > This take appeals to my understanding. Perpetually changing, evolving > and reforming. Input has an outcome and causes an expanded "mind > space", if you will. Is logic all logical and what is to be said about > rationalizing the "irrational"? Should my thinking be correct by the > standards of others or to my own? What of "raising the bar" in > consciousness and of a paradigm shift to a more correct thinking of > our "collective mind" ? Of all that goes into into thought and mind is > this not the desired effect? > > On Apr 30, 9:23 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: >> might thought be colored by the mind that engages it ....what is the realm >> of pure thought that you mention here .... is it logic and >> rationalisation...do you mean the method of employing that thought...because >> ....knowing...percieving something for the first time the mind will >> automatically fall back on the things it thinks it does know.... >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Chad Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Knowledge unites, in being or in identity. Thinking separates, in >> > subject-object relationship. >> > Knowing has no place in the ordinary thought process. Thinking about >> > something >> > which has to be known is wrong, since it moves in a vicious circle. You >> > cannot think >> > of anything you have not known. Such thinking can never take you to the >> > Truth. >> > But when you direct your thought to something (say yourself) which you have >> > otherwise >> > visualized, the thought loses its own characteristics and limits, and >> > stands >> > revealed as that Self (Consciousness) itself. Thought is thus reduced into >> > its essence. >> >> -- >> \--/ Peace- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text -
