My intuition tells me that I-mag-I-nation is the more natural access. Whereas im·ag·i·na·tion is of course the rational and therefore correct separation.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > Our symbols can have archetypal or personal meaning and have a > language of their own that is more intuitive than rational. > Therefore, image is the seed of imag-in-ation. This can be seen by > their appearance in our dreams, where they are unbound by the limits > of rationality, and still express our own natures to us. > > On May 4, 10:23 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Given the current buzz... > > > > I wonder about the debate to show the Crucifixion of Christ back in > > the day. Was it considered too graphic? And think of the multitude of > > images of Christ's face created by artists of many ages and cultures. > > How does an image become a symbol? Of what? >
