To shake the networks' grip To be borne without matrix; The knot not merely cut to serve Freedom seeking society to live.
On May 22, 11:57 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > Shake off...could be how heaven marries > hellhttp://www.archive.org/stream/marriageofheaven00blak/marriageofheaven... > > On May 21, 10:55 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > There are dark things to shake off for sure Molly. > > > On May 21, 12:12 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I see your point, a good one too. At what point does perception > > > become realization. But I would say that there is much more to > > > perception than sensory perception. As William Blake pointed out: "If > > > the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man > > > as it is, infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all > > > things through narrow chinks of his cavern."[ > > > > On May 19, 7:19 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hey Molly, > > > > > Is such a thing truely a perception or a realisation? > > > > > I used to live with a bloke who is colour blind, we rented our place > > > > from two lesbians, and so his perception of the colour of his bedroom > > > > was grey. The bedroom was to my eyes coloured pink, but he knows that > > > > he is colour blind and although not sure of what colour I saw (until > > > > he asked me) he realised that his perception was not correct. > > > > > So we can have a realiastion that our perceptions may not be correct. > > > > > On May 19, 12:09 pm, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > How is it possible, from a non dual perspective, to perceive the world > > > > > as dualistic in nature, and thus an illusion (and separate from > > > > > self)? By definition, this view would remain dualistic. I do think it > > > > > true that how we view the world forms our experience. From a > > > > > dualistic view, some are right, some are wrong. From a non dual view, > > > > > all views are the One/many paradox that is One. How we view (and > > > > > experience) birth and death changes as we change. From a non dual > > > > > perspective, they are only states of transformation and not a > > > > > beginning or end. > > > > > > On May 17, 2:07 pm, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > In duality there is the relationship of the observer and the > > > > > > observed > > > > > > , the knower and the known , that is , there are two. In Non-Duality > > > > > > there is only One and the world which is dualistic in nature , > > > > > > remains > > > > > > what it is , just an illusion - i.e. subject to birth and death. God > > > > > > ,Reality or Atman is Non-Dual and duality is just its expression.- > > > > > > Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
