yeah I think I saw that too somewhere. Is it though access to the internet or access to information?
On Jun 5, 7:02 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > And in the last day or two I read having access to the internet is now > considered a human right but I forget where I saw it- sorry. > > On Jun 3, 7:26 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks! But how do we know he is "right"? :-) I think he has left out > > some monumental variables but I need to read it again. On the other > > hand, I think he is opening the discussion far beyond what we > > accumulate from the news, commentators, politicians or our own bias. > > > Another thought I had was that Luck and Fortune still are > > heavyweights- it does no good to preach rights in a tyranny or if the > > entire population is corrupt- hungry or not. And what about the self- > > interest of those who establish universal rights? However, I will > > continue to think about this- perhaps our global society and inter- > > dependence will force universal standards. Also, I can't help but > > think this is related to a smaller stage- of family, "tribe", > > religion, form of government, type of education and so on- which are > > major influences and he seems to skip over/leave out. > > > On Jun 1, 1:19 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks rigsy! This is one of the best (read: accurate) articles on the > > > subject I've read in a long time. I feel this philosopher has it > > > 'right' as far as I can tell. > > > > On Jun 1, 6:37 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/are-there-natural-hum... > > > > > I started to read the comments which are lively but I need > > > > breakfast...- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
