And in the last day or two I read having access to the internet is now considered a human right but I forget where I saw it- sorry.
On Jun 3, 7:26 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! But how do we know he is "right"? :-) I think he has left out > some monumental variables but I need to read it again. On the other > hand, I think he is opening the discussion far beyond what we > accumulate from the news, commentators, politicians or our own bias. > > Another thought I had was that Luck and Fortune still are > heavyweights- it does no good to preach rights in a tyranny or if the > entire population is corrupt- hungry or not. And what about the self- > interest of those who establish universal rights? However, I will > continue to think about this- perhaps our global society and inter- > dependence will force universal standards. Also, I can't help but > think this is related to a smaller stage- of family, "tribe", > religion, form of government, type of education and so on- which are > major influences and he seems to skip over/leave out. > > On Jun 1, 1:19 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks rigsy! This is one of the best (read: accurate) articles on the > > subject I've read in a long time. I feel this philosopher has it > > 'right' as far as I can tell. > > > On Jun 1, 6:37 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/are-there-natural-hum... > > > > I started to read the comments which are lively but I need breakfast...- > > > Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
