I suppose you or anyone else for that matter would like to know more, but if you find yourself in a position where you do not know who these extra terrestrial beings are, or what is their intention, or whether they are really from the positive side of god, or the negative side the evil forces of the universe, you cannot help to be frightened and wish that you were not there at that moment. Therefore any thought of wanting to know more becomes unimportant. I hope that you see what I mean? Anyhow, I might be going back to write about my Reconciliation of the Universe when I have written lots of other personal religious explanations, and if they show up again then I hope to be strong enough to talk to them.
On Jun 11, 5:53 am, paradox <[email protected]> wrote: > I can understand how unsettling it must have been for you, Menfranco; > but aren't you curious? It'd be interesting to exchange ideas with > these visitors, don't you think? > > On Jun 10, 12:13 am, Menfranco Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > This event happened only once in 2005, and I do not like for this to > > happen again. So, I have to say that since then I am postponing to > > write any religious writings that I believe may stir the spiritual > > side to show up again, whether what I saw and heard was spiritual or > > perhaps time traveller capable of reading what is in our minds, I am > > saying time travellers so to speak for want of a better definition. > > > On Jun 10, 2:48 am, paradox <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Menfranco, i think your experience is very intriguing :) > > > > I'm curious, how long ago was this experience, and have the good folks > > > visited you again since? > > > > On Jun 9, 1:09 am, Menfranco Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Chuck! > > > > <Nanotech is just the implementation of another layer of our > > > > understanding of > > > > the universe. I think we still have a long ways to go before we > > > > actually > > > > have a firm grasp on the true nature of reality.> > > > > Hi Chuck, thanks for replying to my post; I have been too busy lately > > > > but finally I can reply to your post and also to other members of > > > > “Mind Eye”. So, you say that we have a long way to go before we grasp > > > > on the true nature of reality, I guess you are right on that one, but > > > > then we the people of this earth are always doubtful about many > > > > things; I suppose with this nanotech study one day we will be able to > > > > explain many more things. > > > > Now let me go back to the possibilities that there are other planets > > > > which could be able to sustain life just like our earth, as this is > > > > the main thread in these discussions here. > > > > Now let me say my own views or understanding of the existence of life > > > > in the universe, I have reasons to believe that there are indeed extra > > > > terrestrial beings, because I have had a personal encounter with such > > > > existence. I know that now you are thinking that I may well be a > > > > nutcase, but I don’t care what you think about this encounter that I > > > > am talking about, because for me this encounter really took place, and > > > > if it did not it might have been just a vision, or perhaps a realistic > > > > dream that I believe it is real. But then I have to say that it could > > > > not be a dream, because in a dream things are usually strange and > > > > change from one thing to another, but in this encounter everything was > > > > just the usual way, so it could not be a dream, and now I would like > > > > to tell you part of this dream. > > > > AND THEN ONE DAY! > > > > And then one day I had a real surprise, because my prayer above was > > > > really answered: > > > > Incredible as it may seem this event really took place and even > > > > surprised me, because while I was going to the local shops one very > > > > late afternoon just before sunset, I saw three persons that I had > > > > never seen before on the footpath which I was walking on, they were > > > > fully dressed in simple tidy everyday clothes even though it was > > > > summer, and in summer most men here ware shorts, while women ware > > > > flimsy clothes to keep cool. Looking back at this event it seems to me > > > > that these three persons were waiting for me to pass near them; and as > > > > I was approaching them two of them a man and a woman started walking > > > > towards me leaving the other man alone, so that I had to walk between > > > > them to keep going to this shop, they had to be from heaven, because > > > > what the man left alone on my left said to me no human being on earth > > > > could ever have known at that time. > > > > GREETINGS TO THE AUTHOR OF RECONCILIATION OF THE UNIVERSE! > > > > One of these angels said to me with a courteous jest. > > > > But I was terrified from this sudden happening and moved away from > > > > them in fear. > > > > About this supernatural happening I will describe to you later on, in > > > > a more detailed way, in a special place within these writings, where > > > > it would be easier to understand why this happened to me, since in > > > > that position it will make more sense to the readers. For now I want > > > > only to say that this apparition is what really pushes me to continue > > > > to write these religious writings, since this is for me the proof of > > > > the existence of a higher intelligence in the whole universe and the > > > > proof that we are not alone. > > > > Believe it or not this has happened to me, and if you are interested > > > > to read more about it here is a link to my religious writings; > > > > https://sites.google.com/site/prayersofreconciliation/ > > > > You need to go to the bottom of the page and click on the links > > > > therein to read what I have already published on the Internet. > > > > My regards Menfranco > > > > > On May 30, 10:36 am, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Nanotech is just the implementation of another layer of our > > > > > understanding of > > > > > the universe. I think we still have a long ways to go before we > > > > > actually > > > > > have a firm grasp on the true nature of reality. > > > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Menfranco Laws <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > > > Well said Ash, where is Pat indeed when we need him to say God's > > > > > > things, because for me when you are talking about nanotech makes me > > > > > > thing about God and ask myself this question; Is this nanotech the > > > > > > link between us and God? Perhaps once we have learned enough about > > > > > > this nanotech we be able to understand how God works? Who knows? it > > > > > > is > > > > > > just a thought. > > > > > > > On May 24, 9:48 am, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Where's Pat when we need him? > > > > > > > > On 5/23/2011 8:08 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm fairly certian this site is not umm being honest. As far > > > > > > > > as I > > > > > > > > know we simply have not yet managed to do this. > > > > > > > > > One of the biggest problems in quantum compting is that old > > > > > > > > quantum > > > > > > > > chestnut of simply by looking we influence the result. > > > > > > > > > With Quantum bit (Qbit) computing, the idea is to make use of > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > verious quantum states of a moclucule, so that a Qbit can hold > > > > > > > > possibly 4 (all to do with spin) pieces of data at the same > > > > > > > > time. The > > > > > > > > problem comes in retriving this data and ensuring that by > > > > > > > > 'reading' > > > > > > > > the data it remains unchanged. > > > > > > > > > On May 20, 10:17 pm, gabbydott<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Thanks for providing me with the right key words. And this is > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > stuff I > > > > > > > >> meant:http://www.dwavesys.com/en/products-services.html > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Chuck Bowling< > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> Nanotechnology is used in a lot of places but it's still far > > > > > > > >>> from > > > > > > reaching > > > > > > > >>> its full potential. Right now most nanotech is just new > > > > > > > >>> applications > > > > > > of > > > > > > > >>> materials science. Potentially nanotech could be used to > > > > > > > >>> create > > > > > > robots > > > > > > > >>> smaller than a single human cell or for that matter to create > > > > > > > >>> new > > > > > > life. > > > > > > > >>> As to quantum physics, it provides insight into > > > > > > > >>> microelectronics. But > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >>> hope is that one day we will be able to create computers > > > > > > > >>> based on > > > > > > quantum > > > > > > > >>> spin. That still hasn't happened yet. > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:58 AM, > > > > > > > >>> gabbydott<[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> What? I thought nanotech was already in use in the cosmetics > > > > > > industry and > > > > > > > >>>> quantatech (is that how you call it?) in the computer > > > > > > > >>>> industry. > > > > > > > >>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chuck Bowling< > > > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>> I'm in agreement about the radical changes that nanotech > > > > > > > >>>>> appear to > > > > > > > >>>>> promise. Changes that could spell doom or a complete > > > > > > > >>>>> redefinition > > > > > > of what it > > > > > > > >>>>> is to be human. It's about the only thing that makes me > > > > > > > >>>>> want to > > > > > > live longer > > > > > > > >>>>> than my allotted time. Just so that I can see what miracles > > > > > > > >>>>> come > > > > > > next. > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Ash<[email protected]> > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>> Yeah, I was fear mongering Chuck, a political device. > > > > > > > >>>>>> ;-) This > > > > > > is a > > > > > > > >>>>>> favorite topic of mine, it is at the axis of many fields. > > > > > > > >>>>>> To > > > > > > accelerate > > > > > > > >>>>>> nanotech development I think we should implement rapid > > > > > > prototyping, > > > > > > > >>>>>> experimentation and analysis systems. When I envision man > > > > > > > >>>>>> at the > > > > > > beginning > > > > > > > >>>>>> of this revolution I look for tools that would allow an > > > > > > > >>>>>> explosion > > > > > > > >>>>>> (figuratively) of development, being able to catalog and > > > > > > > >>>>>> operate a > > > > > > multitude > > > > > > > >>>>>> of experiments in parallel, while building a massive > > > > > > > >>>>>> library of > > > > > > modeled > > > > > > > >>>>>> behavior for materials and systems interoperating in the > > > > > > > >>>>>> real > > > > > > world to > > > > > > > >>>>>> improve the robustness and diversity of this technology is > > > > > > apparently the > > > > > > > >>>>>> way to go. To think that the behavior of biological > > > > > > > >>>>>> systems can be > > > > > > > >>>>>> abstracted and used to formulate dynamic systems guided by > > > > > > > >>>>>> expert > > > > > > algorithms > > > > > > > >>>>>> to solve material challenges in real time guided by people > > > > > > > >>>>>> over > > > > > > vast > > > > > > > >>>>>> distances, it goes beyond genetics, I am in awe at the > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
