This event happened only once in 2005, and I do not like for this to happen again. So, I have to say that since then I am postponing to write any religious writings that I believe may stir the spiritual side to show up again, whether what I saw and heard was spiritual or perhaps time traveller capable of reading what is in our minds, I am saying time travellers so to speak for want of a better definition.
On Jun 10, 2:48 am, paradox <[email protected]> wrote: > Menfranco, i think your experience is very intriguing :) > > I'm curious, how long ago was this experience, and have the good folks > visited you again since? > > On Jun 9, 1:09 am, Menfranco Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Chuck! > > <Nanotech is just the implementation of another layer of our > > understanding of > > the universe. I think we still have a long ways to go before we > > actually > > have a firm grasp on the true nature of reality.> > > Hi Chuck, thanks for replying to my post; I have been too busy lately > > but finally I can reply to your post and also to other members of > > “Mind Eye”. So, you say that we have a long way to go before we grasp > > on the true nature of reality, I guess you are right on that one, but > > then we the people of this earth are always doubtful about many > > things; I suppose with this nanotech study one day we will be able to > > explain many more things. > > Now let me go back to the possibilities that there are other planets > > which could be able to sustain life just like our earth, as this is > > the main thread in these discussions here. > > Now let me say my own views or understanding of the existence of life > > in the universe, I have reasons to believe that there are indeed extra > > terrestrial beings, because I have had a personal encounter with such > > existence. I know that now you are thinking that I may well be a > > nutcase, but I don’t care what you think about this encounter that I > > am talking about, because for me this encounter really took place, and > > if it did not it might have been just a vision, or perhaps a realistic > > dream that I believe it is real. But then I have to say that it could > > not be a dream, because in a dream things are usually strange and > > change from one thing to another, but in this encounter everything was > > just the usual way, so it could not be a dream, and now I would like > > to tell you part of this dream. > > AND THEN ONE DAY! > > And then one day I had a real surprise, because my prayer above was > > really answered: > > Incredible as it may seem this event really took place and even > > surprised me, because while I was going to the local shops one very > > late afternoon just before sunset, I saw three persons that I had > > never seen before on the footpath which I was walking on, they were > > fully dressed in simple tidy everyday clothes even though it was > > summer, and in summer most men here ware shorts, while women ware > > flimsy clothes to keep cool. Looking back at this event it seems to me > > that these three persons were waiting for me to pass near them; and as > > I was approaching them two of them a man and a woman started walking > > towards me leaving the other man alone, so that I had to walk between > > them to keep going to this shop, they had to be from heaven, because > > what the man left alone on my left said to me no human being on earth > > could ever have known at that time. > > GREETINGS TO THE AUTHOR OF RECONCILIATION OF THE UNIVERSE! > > One of these angels said to me with a courteous jest. > > But I was terrified from this sudden happening and moved away from > > them in fear. > > About this supernatural happening I will describe to you later on, in > > a more detailed way, in a special place within these writings, where > > it would be easier to understand why this happened to me, since in > > that position it will make more sense to the readers. For now I want > > only to say that this apparition is what really pushes me to continue > > to write these religious writings, since this is for me the proof of > > the existence of a higher intelligence in the whole universe and the > > proof that we are not alone. > > Believe it or not this has happened to me, and if you are interested > > to read more about it here is a link to my religious writings; > > https://sites.google.com/site/prayersofreconciliation/ > > You need to go to the bottom of the page and click on the links > > therein to read what I have already published on the Internet. > > My regards Menfranco > > > On May 30, 10:36 am, Chuck Bowling <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Nanotech is just the implementation of another layer of our understanding > > > of > > > the universe. I think we still have a long ways to go before we actually > > > have a firm grasp on the true nature of reality. > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Menfranco Laws <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi everybody! > > > > Well said Ash, where is Pat indeed when we need him to say God's > > > > things, because for me when you are talking about nanotech makes me > > > > thing about God and ask myself this question; Is this nanotech the > > > > link between us and God? Perhaps once we have learned enough about > > > > this nanotech we be able to understand how God works? Who knows? it is > > > > just a thought. > > > > > On May 24, 9:48 am, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Where's Pat when we need him? > > > > > > On 5/23/2011 8:08 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > I'm fairly certian this site is not umm being honest. As far as I > > > > > > know we simply have not yet managed to do this. > > > > > > > One of the biggest problems in quantum compting is that old quantum > > > > > > chestnut of simply by looking we influence the result. > > > > > > > With Quantum bit (Qbit) computing, the idea is to make use of the > > > > > > verious quantum states of a moclucule, so that a Qbit can hold > > > > > > possibly 4 (all to do with spin) pieces of data at the same time. > > > > > > The > > > > > > problem comes in retriving this data and ensuring that by 'reading' > > > > > > the data it remains unchanged. > > > > > > > On May 20, 10:17 pm, gabbydott<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks for providing me with the right key words. And this is the > > > > stuff I > > > > > >> meant:http://www.dwavesys.com/en/products-services.html > > > > > > >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Chuck Bowling< > > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >>> Nanotechnology is used in a lot of places but it's still far from > > > > reaching > > > > > >>> its full potential. Right now most nanotech is just new > > > > > >>> applications > > > > of > > > > > >>> materials science. Potentially nanotech could be used to create > > > > robots > > > > > >>> smaller than a single human cell or for that matter to create new > > > > life. > > > > > >>> As to quantum physics, it provides insight into microelectronics. > > > > > >>> But > > > > the > > > > > >>> hope is that one day we will be able to create computers based on > > > > quantum > > > > > >>> spin. That still hasn't happened yet. > > > > > >>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:58 AM, gabbydott<[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>> What? I thought nanotech was already in use in the cosmetics > > > > industry and > > > > > >>>> quantatech (is that how you call it?) in the computer industry. > > > > > >>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chuck Bowling< > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> I'm in agreement about the radical changes that nanotech appear > > > > > >>>>> to > > > > > >>>>> promise. Changes that could spell doom or a complete > > > > > >>>>> redefinition > > > > of what it > > > > > >>>>> is to be human. It's about the only thing that makes me want to > > > > live longer > > > > > >>>>> than my allotted time. Just so that I can see what miracles come > > > > next. > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Ash<[email protected]> > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> Yeah, I was fear mongering Chuck, a political device. ;-) > > > > > >>>>>> This > > > > is a > > > > > >>>>>> favorite topic of mine, it is at the axis of many fields. To > > > > accelerate > > > > > >>>>>> nanotech development I think we should implement rapid > > > > prototyping, > > > > > >>>>>> experimentation and analysis systems. When I envision man at > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > beginning > > > > > >>>>>> of this revolution I look for tools that would allow an > > > > > >>>>>> explosion > > > > > >>>>>> (figuratively) of development, being able to catalog and > > > > > >>>>>> operate a > > > > multitude > > > > > >>>>>> of experiments in parallel, while building a massive library of > > > > modeled > > > > > >>>>>> behavior for materials and systems interoperating in the real > > > > world to > > > > > >>>>>> improve the robustness and diversity of this technology is > > > > apparently the > > > > > >>>>>> way to go. To think that the behavior of biological systems > > > > > >>>>>> can be > > > > > >>>>>> abstracted and used to formulate dynamic systems guided by > > > > > >>>>>> expert > > > > algorithms > > > > > >>>>>> to solve material challenges in real time guided by people over > > > > vast > > > > > >>>>>> distances, it goes beyond genetics, I am in awe at the > > > > > >>>>>> potential > > > > universe we > > > > > >>>>>> are venturing toward. We will also be able to make changes to > > > > ourselves and > > > > > >>>>>> our experience of this world at a similar rate.. > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/19/2011 1:41 AM, Chuck Bowling wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> I think that with nanotechnology we will be able to synthesize > > > > pretty > > > > > >>>>>> much anything we want from raw materials in the future. > > > > > >>>>>> Assuming > > > > that any > > > > > >>>>>> alien race capable of traveling the trillions of miles to get > > > > > >>>>>> here > > > > would > > > > > >>>>>> have at least the same level of technology my guess is that > > > > > >>>>>> they > > > > wouldn't > > > > > >>>>>> need anything we'd have to offer. > > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Ash<[email protected]> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>> There is another good reason to develop our technologies as > > > > > >>>>>>> a > > > > species, > > > > > >>>>>>> think how we are looking at the planets and celestial bodies > > > > > >>>>>>> as > > > > vast > > > > > >>>>>>> resources. Imagine if something else came through and strip > > > > > >>>>>>> mined > > > > the > > > > > >>>>>>> resources we would need to develop into a spacefaring species, > > > > that would > > > > > >>>>>>> suck big time. Like a tribe of humans moving through and > > > > > >>>>>>> picking > > > > all the > > > > > >>>>>>> nuts we squirrels need, or worse, deciding we were in the way > > > > > >>>>>>> of > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
