What are prisons but holding pens so society feels smug about its
culture?

There are probably enough hospitals and schools- what's missing is
methods, cost controls, etc.

Britain and the USA are broke/in debt. China is over-extended. Etc.

The best way out of debt is not to spend money you don't have and pay
off debts as soon as possible.

On Aug 18, 6:37 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
> It does seem ludicrus to me that with an ever expanding population
> that next to nowt has been done to expand our infrastructure.  We need
> to be building more prisions, more hospitals, more shcools, more
> social houseing.  I mean that is common sense innit?
>
> It also occours to me that amongst the very best ways out of recision
> is building.
>
> On Aug 18, 12:31 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You will also wind up paying higher taxes for those that are sent to
> > prison according to a lawyer on BBC radio last night. I think he said
> > prisons are already burdened with 86,000 souls (but the USA beats that
> > figure by miles). It sounds like the courts are swamped and handing
> > down stiff sentences so the country can repair its moral core/civil
> > behavior. Besides, the Olympics are coming up and after all that money
> > is invested, one would not want to frighten away the tourists- like
> > they have in the Middle East.
>
> > On Aug 17, 7:34 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Don't worry, archy. You will be paying higher insurance premiums to
> > > cover the losses anyway. Trickle down justice.
>
> > > On Aug 17, 7:18 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I think Orn is right.  Rationalists are often impossible fantasists
> > > > leading highly disturbed lives.  But if emotions are an ever present
> > > > as I'd agree, one can deny them to some degree if you can catch
> > > > yourself (and as importantly others) in them when moral judgement runs
> > > > afoot.
> > > > That we are brainless in this area as a general population is obvious
> > > > from reaction to the UK 'riots' and demands for heavy punishments (our
> > > > courts are berserk at the moment) for these people but can't even see
> > > > that we are being looted by the rich and are not even investigating
> > > > them.
> > > > I'm an advocate of modern National Service that would involve
> > > > disciplined work but not necessarily armed service - but we can't pay
> > > > for it because the rich have looted the money and have
> > > > disproportionate influence on government through their rotten
> > > > accumulations.
> > > > We should be some time to such reactions before deciding, but if one
> > > > gives power such time it usually steal the moment and the decision for
> > > > itself.
>
> > > > On Aug 17, 11:45 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Ohh Rigys, i don't doubt for a second that thoese effecthave every
> > > > > right to be angry, I question wether or not morality is best served
> > > > > with any emotional attachment.  I have used anger as an example, but
> > > > > really I mean all emotions.
>
> > > > > A freind of mine posted on facebook something along the lines of bring
> > > > > back national servic, as a punishment for the looters. This was said
> > > > > in anger and when it comes down to it, is it a good idea to teach
> > > > > thugs how to kill?
>
> > > > > On Aug 16, 11:45 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > There must be laws on the books to cover riots, looting, damage to
> > > > > > property. This isn't the first era of a poor economy for Britain. 
> > > > > > Has
> > > > > > networking changed the formulas?
>
> > > > > > Another factor is immigration and clash of cultures and religions.
> > > > > > What if once cheap labor is no longer needed? It seems to me- 
> > > > > > though I
> > > > > > may be wrong- that immigrants rarely return to their original 
> > > > > > homeland
> > > > > > and bring their new skills and education forward in third world
> > > > > > countries. And social programs may quash desires to roll up their
> > > > > > sleeves once again in their homeland.
>
> > > > > > I learned this weekend from a discussion that one cannot fire upon a
> > > > > > thief- it's only permitted when one's life is in jeopardy. That 
> > > > > > seems
> > > > > > a thin line- wait till the bloke attempts to kill you! Our laws have
> > > > > > probably changed a great deal- I doubt cattle rustlers were treated 
> > > > > > so
> > > > > > mercifully.
>
> > > > > > As to anger, I think shop owners and home dwellers and townsmen had/
> > > > > > have every right to be blistering mad at the looters and rioters.
>
> > > > > > I made a long list of non-lethal protective measures. Baseball bats
> > > > > > were not on the list as they can crack a skull and kill someone.
>
> > > > > > On Aug 16, 6:09 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Paradox, yes agreat frind of mine tells me the same sorta thing, 
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > morality without emotion is somehow lacking.  It is partly due to 
> > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > words and my respect for him that I have started this thread.
>
> > > > > > > However as Rigsy points out to evict a looter from his council 
> > > > > > > home
> > > > > > > for his looting does not adress any problems, nor does it serve as
> > > > > > > adiquate punishment, and would I think only make things worse.
>
> > > > > > > This course of actions is a fine example of thinking/talking about
> > > > > > > morality whilst angry, and is to my mind no good at all.
>
> > > > > > > I maintian that morality is best sreved without emotions 
> > > > > > > attached, can
> > > > > > > you show my why I am wrong?
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 14, 5:31 pm, paradox <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Deep question, Lee; not an easy one. One who suffers injury 
> > > > > > > > must have
> > > > > > > > the right of redress, be that restitution or retribution, or 
> > > > > > > > else we
> > > > > > > > live in Hobbes's state of nature. The question of balance and
> > > > > > > > proportionality is the proper remit of the law courts and great 
> > > > > > > > minds.
> > > > > > > > Where the injury in question falls outside the purview of the
> > > > > > > > collective good or the legal framework to that end, morality and
> > > > > > > > values must act to constrain the individual in respect of 
> > > > > > > > balance and
> > > > > > > > proportionality; that is why it's so very vital that we 
> > > > > > > > understand
> > > > > > > > what we do when we tinker with the foundations and structures 
> > > > > > > > of a
> > > > > > > > society's moral compass.
>
> > > > > > > > Personally, i've always felt that emotions are the fuel for the
> > > > > > > > directed mind.
>
> > > > > > > > On Aug 12, 1:28 pm, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > So as we should all know we have had quite a week of it here 
> > > > > > > > > in the
> > > > > > > > > UK.  Facebook and many other web places have been inundated 
> > > > > > > > > with all
> > > > > > > > > sorts of sillyness.
>
> > > > > > > > > Calls to bring back national service, calls to evict those 
> > > > > > > > > found
> > > > > > > > > guilty of the rioting and looting, calls to stop their 
> > > > > > > > > benifits.  I
> > > > > > > > > have witnessed some of my good good friends spew out all 
> > > > > > > > > mannor of
> > > > > > > > > sillyness in their anger.
>
> > > > > > > > > I have procliamed in the past that all questions of morality 
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > better served sans emotions and I see much this week that has 
> > > > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > > firmed this view.
>
> > > > > > > > > In order to discover though the validity of this thought tell 
> > > > > > > > > me do
> > > > > > > > > you agree, or not and why?  People of ME sway my opinion with 
> > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > wise words.
>
> > > > > > > > > What good can come of deciding upon a course of action whilst 
> > > > > > > > > holding
> > > > > > > > > onto your anger?
>
> > > > > > > > > I ask of course as a self confessed recovered angry man.- 
> > > > > > > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to