For the record: it is exactly the painted business model with its avoidance strategy that I criticize. I will try find other images that say the same but will give me time to be decided upon to be ban-worthy for having formed that opinion.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, we now have three moderators who have agreed to vote on the > issue of banning. We are a diverse group. My suggestion is that we > applaud our commonalities instead of criticizing our differences. We > are back in business. Let's all do what we can to avoid blowing the > whole thing up again. > > On Oct 3, 4:12 am, Vam <[email protected]> wrote: > > " Allan is back " is putting it back on even keel. > > > > " Orn was very considerate." holds the cultural seeds to upsetting the > > evenness without warning ! > > > > * sigh * That's what I suppose the phrase " long haul " means. > > > > As it says, " It is less about oppressors, my dear. It is the patrons > > who kill us with inscrutable intensity !" > > > > On Oct 3, 12:52 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Orn was very considerate. Story hopefully ends. > > > > > On Sep 17, 6:10 am, allan deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Do not place the blaming me one you cut off my entire feed allanh1946 > so > > > > there was no way to reply only expected messages. > > > > I have been watching tell every how you deleted the offending posts > and I > > > > was permanetly banned. > > > > As for being a mediator okay I will be one, you never asked.. > > > > You can ask others if they will accept me. > > > > Allan > > > > On Sep 17, 2011 6:24 AM, "ornamentalmind" < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: >
