I agree about the "avoidance" part. Been rethinking that since I posted it.
On Oct 3, 5:48 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > For the record: it is exactly the painted business model with its avoidance > strategy that I criticize. I will try find other images that say the same > but will give me time to be decided upon to be ban-worthy for having formed > that opinion. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, we now have three moderators who have agreed to vote on the > > issue of banning. We are a diverse group. My suggestion is that we > > applaud our commonalities instead of criticizing our differences. We > > are back in business. Let's all do what we can to avoid blowing the > > whole thing up again. > > > On Oct 3, 4:12 am, Vam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > " Allan is back " is putting it back on even keel. > > > > " Orn was very considerate." holds the cultural seeds to upsetting the > > > evenness without warning ! > > > > * sigh * That's what I suppose the phrase " long haul " means. > > > > As it says, " It is less about oppressors, my dear. It is the patrons > > > who kill us with inscrutable intensity !" > > > > On Oct 3, 12:52 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > and Orn was very considerate. Story hopefully ends. > > > > > On Sep 17, 6:10 am, allan deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Do not place the blaming me one you cut off my entire feed allanh1946 > > so > > > > > there was no way to reply only expected messages. > > > > > I have been watching tell every how you deleted the offending posts > > and I > > > > > was permanetly banned. > > > > > As for being a mediator okay I will be one, you never asked.. > > > > > You can ask others if they will accept me. > > > > > Allan > > > > > On Sep 17, 2011 6:24 AM, "ornamentalmind" < > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote:
