Ugh, is that still English? Sound odd to me. ;) On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:48 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> For the record: it is exactly the painted business model with its avoidance > strategy that I criticize. I will try find other images that say the same > but will give me time to be decided upon to be ban-worthy for having formed > that opinion. > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, we now have three moderators who have agreed to vote on the >> issue of banning. We are a diverse group. My suggestion is that we >> applaud our commonalities instead of criticizing our differences. We >> are back in business. Let's all do what we can to avoid blowing the >> whole thing up again. >> >> On Oct 3, 4:12 am, Vam <[email protected]> wrote: >> > " Allan is back " is putting it back on even keel. >> > >> > " Orn was very considerate." holds the cultural seeds to upsetting the >> > evenness without warning ! >> > >> > * sigh * That's what I suppose the phrase " long haul " means. >> > >> > As it says, " It is less about oppressors, my dear. It is the patrons >> > who kill us with inscrutable intensity !" >> > >> > On Oct 3, 12:52 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > and Orn was very considerate. Story hopefully ends. >> > >> > > On Sep 17, 6:10 am, allan deheretic <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > Do not place the blaming me one you cut off my entire feed >> allanh1946 so >> > > > there was no way to reply only expected messages. >> > > > I have been watching tell every how you deleted the offending posts >> and I >> > > > was permanetly banned. >> > > > As for being a mediator okay I will be one, you never asked.. >> > > > You can ask others if they will accept me. >> > > > Allan >> > > > On Sep 17, 2011 6:24 AM, "ornamentalmind" < >> [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > >
